The Mises Community
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Molyneux continues to embarrass Libertarian movement

rated by 0 users
This post has 111 Replies | 9 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,247
Points 65,050
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
SystemAdministrator

In the case of buisiness-state and church-state relations, it's usually a tit for tat in which one is granted special privileges so long as loyalty is maintained to the other. As a consequence of this, religious and economic institutions can effectively be artificially strengthened through patronage with the state. They're never really eliminated, they just become more like states in themselves and become part of a parasitic class. They've hardly been historical enemies of the state at all.

Yes, that is what I mean though, the amalgamation is effective destruction.

-Jon

To darkness I condemn you...

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,669
Points 81,345

Brainpolice:
Why does everything go back to the reds with you, as if that's an example of statism as a whole?

It's an example nonetheless, albeit one that's all too inconvenient for you.

Brainpolice:
some kind of bastion of virtue that is always opposed to the state.

Brainpolice:
None of that aims at abolishing the family so much as co-opting and controling it. The abolition of the family as such, however, doesn't follow.

So now you're playing semantic games?

"You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows"

Bob Dylan

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,810
Points 27,770
Moderator
MVP

Redundant thread is redundant.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 48
Points 855

The state's purpose is to pursue the agenda of the gay mafia and overthrow the heterosexual male and the inherent virtuosity of heterosexuality. Hmm

I do not see why the traditionalists cannot isolate the virtues they see in traditional social forms and defend those, rather than defending tradition qua tradition.

 

 

 

 

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 787
Points 13,395
banned replied on Tue, Nov 18 2008 5:03 PM

GilesStratton:
http://praxeology.net/nextelection.htm

Woah, did you read the date on that? Long's opinions haven't changed for over 12 years?

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 100 Contributor
Male
Posts 378
Points 7,330

Donny with an A:

(I can't BELIEVE no one has quoted Hitler yet!)

"There is a road to freedom. Its milestones are Obedience, Endeavor, Honesty, Order, Cleanliness, Sobriety, Truthfulness, Sacrifice, and love of the Fatherland." -Hitler

"I cannot prove, but am prepared to affirm, that if you take care of clarity in reasoning, most good causes will take care of themselves, while some bad ones are taken care of as a matter of course." -Anthony de Jasay

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,669
Points 81,345

Solid_Choke:
"There is a road to freedom. Its milestones are Obedience, Endeavor, Honesty, Order, Cleanliness, Sobriety, Truthfulness, Sacrifice, and love of the Fatherland." -Hitler

Sounds good.

"You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows"

Bob Dylan

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 755
Points 30,375
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator

I had in mind "Universal education is the most corroding and disintegrating poison that liberalism has ever invented for its own destruction"

http://libertarian-left.blogspot.com/

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 530
Points 11,510
Sage replied on Tue, Nov 18 2008 10:19 PM

Giles, Roderick's position is that voting isn't immoral, but it is inefficient and should be minimized as a strategy.

LibertarianAnarchy.com - Government is immoral, unnecessary, and doesn't work!

  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Male
Posts 18
Points 450

Sorry, I posted this elsewhere without noticing this thread...

As you may know, Freedomain Radio was featured in an article in the British newspaper The Guardian last weekend.

Now, as we all know, the mainstream media is often far from accurate when it comes to representing libertarian, free-market or voluntarist ideas. I think that this article is a very good example of how a source can take a reporter for a ride.

If you would like to read the article, and my response to it, you can click below, I think it is very interesting, please let me know what you think.Smile

http://www.fdrurl.com/guardian

Best wishes,

Stef

I am the host of Freedomain Radio, the most popular philosophy show on the web, and a Top 10 Finalist in the 2007 Podcast Awards. http://www.freedomainradio.com

Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 783
Points 14,600

Sage:

Giles, Roderick's position is that voting isn't immoral, but it is inefficient and should be minimized as a strategy.

 

That is my view as well. From a moral standpoint (depending on your motivation for voting at least) it can be justified as a form of self-defense, its effectiveness is another matter. It could be compared to using a medicine dropper filled with water to try to put out a forest fire.

I am an eklektarchist not an anarchist.

Educational Pamphlet Mises Group

  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Posts 5
Points 100

Sorry, I posted this elsewhere without noticing this thread...

Your reply to the Guardian, is qualitatively about as good as, your UPB:

 

 

Links:
ANCAPS Discussion Forum
MolyneuxCultWatch

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 6 of 6 (112 items) « First ... < Previous 2 3 4 5 6 | RSS

Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528

Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119

contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises

Mises.org sitemap