The Mises Community
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Interest Rates Before Fed

rated by 0 users
Not Answered This post has 0 verified answers | 6 Replies | 3 Followers

Not Ranked
7 Posts
Points 220
Cluesaw posted on Wed, Oct 1 2008 1:46 PM

Question--------

How did banks set interest rates before 1913   (before the Fed was born)?

Thanks.

 

  • | Post Points: 65

All Replies

Top 10 Contributor
Male
7,643 Posts
Points 132,735
MVP
SystemAdministrator

I'm *assuming* competition.

If you find something evil that wobbles, push it. - Gary North

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
410 Posts
Points 8,530

specifically what interest rates? 

do we get free cheezeburger in socielism?

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
32 Posts
Points 470

There is an interesting chapter on Interest Rates in:

http://mises.org/books/historyofmoney.pdf

If you have not read it, check it out. This is a great book.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Male
1,501 Posts
Points 28,695
Moderator

There were other central banks before the Fed. But in the absence of central banking, the interest rate is set by saving/investment. For example, if saving increases, there will be a lower interest rate because people will buy more CDs, stocks, and the like (an increase in supply) and at the same time the demand for loans will decrease (since they'll be able to pay for more from their saved money).

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
4,669 Posts
Points 81,345

krazy kaju:
There were other central banks before the Fed. But in the absence of central banking, the interest rate is set by saving/investment. For example, if saving increases, there will be a lower interest rate because people will buy more CDs, stocks, and the like (an increase in supply) and at the same time the demand for loans will decrease (since they'll be able to pay for more from their saved money).

I've posted this before and Jon answer but I'm still not sure I understand, let's say a large number of people want to say money but don't want that saved money to generate interest. Without FRB they use the bank as a warehouse for their gold and the gold can't be loaned out. Now, despite the fact that a lot of people are foregoing current consumption for future consumption there aren't a great deal of loanable funds and hence would the interest rate not be higher than the time preferences of the individuals in society?

I understand the opposite isn't true under full reserve banking and hence you can't have the buisness cycle but I don't understand this.

"You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows"

Bob Dylan

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Male
1,501 Posts
Points 28,695
Moderator

People would just buy more stocks, CDs, etc. A lot of people have a lot of money they don't use sitting around in the bank. If you have to pay for storage, people would just buy short-term (e.g. one month) CDs and the like so they can still have the money relatively quickly if they need it but they get interest.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (7 items) | RSS

Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528

Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119

contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises

Mises.org sitemap