The Mises Community
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Who Is Willing To Defend the Robber Barons

This post has 111 Replies | 14 Followers

Top 25 Contributor
Posts 2,452
Points 39,370
Moderator

Lisa Hayes:
Where does the employer get the right to deny his or her workers decent working conditons?

Where does the landlord get the right to deny my demand for a different bathtub?

 

Lisa Hayes:
Where does the employer get the right to machine gun his workers if they decide to try and form a union

He doesn't; he merely gets the usurped authority from the government.

 

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 2,452
Points 39,370
Moderator

Lisa Hayes:
Not every one can simply afford to quit there job and find a new one. Leaveing one job for another job is not automatic procces.

And somehow this creates a positive obligation on the part of the employer as a positive right of the worker? Non sequitur/petitio principii.

 

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 1,691
Points 26,900

Robber Barons is an incorrect term.

In the middle ages, Robber Barons were petty lords on continental Europe who charged tolls to allow merchants to cross their domains. They were rent seekers, not merchants. If anyone today resembles robber barons it is the politicians, not businessmen.

 

Peace
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
Male
Posts 175
Points 4,190
ChaseCola replied on Sun, Aug 24 2008 9:33 PM

Lisa Hayes:

Where does the employer get the right to deny his or her workers decent working conditons?

It is his property and he can do with it as he sees fit. But if he cares about getting workers, he best have decent working conditions.

Lisa Hayes:

Where does the employer get the right to machine gun his workers if they decide to try and form a union?

He/she doesnt have that right, but he/she does have the right to get them the hell off his/her property.

 

 "The plans differ; the planners are all alike"

-Bastiat

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 7,643
Points 132,735
MVP
SystemAdministrator

Lisa Hayes:

Not every one can simply afford to quit there job and find a new one. Leaveing one job for another job is not automatic procces.

Finding qualified, trained/trainable labour isn't exactly automatic either.  Good employees don't grow on trees, that is why they make a premium over their coworkers, or leave and start their own businesses.

Lisa Hayes

If you find something evil that wobbles, push it. - Gary North

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 31
Points 1,115

I am well aware of how the governent interviened sometimes in order to restore order and put down workers who were supposedly violating property rights. If a riot gets out of hand than perhaps the government should get involved in order to restore order. In any event sometimes the government did not get involved and sometimes the private sector would hire there own security forces in the first place to restore order.Even today this happens.

 

For example in columbia Coca-Cola has often times hired thugs with guns to assinate labour leaders,or get rid of workers who are attempting to unionize.

 

In any event lets pretend that the Robber Barons never took the law into there own hand,and instead relied on the government to break up strikes. Because even if only the government got involved you would still need to explain why the workers were so unhappy with there working conditions.

Why did the Workers riot in the first place?

  • | Post Points: 50
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 31
Points 1,115

//He/she doesnt have that right, but he/she does have the right to get them the hell off his/her property.//

 

Since when did you get decide who has the right to X or not do X.

 

Since when does anyone have the right to tell someone to get off my property and enforce that right with the threat of force?

  • | Post Points: 65
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 2,452
Points 39,370
Moderator

Lisa Hayes:
I am well aware of how the governent interviened sometimes in order to restore order and put down workers who were supposedly violating property rights.

Then you know that your entire premise has failed.

 

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
Male
Posts 175
Points 4,190
ChaseCola replied on Sun, Aug 24 2008 9:40 PM

Lisa Hayes:

I am well aware of how the governent interviened sometimes in order to restore order and put down workers who were supposedly violating property rights. If a riot gets out of hand than perhaps the government should get involved in order to restore order. In any event sometimes the government did not get involved and sometimes the private sector would hire there own security forces in the first place to restore order.Even today this happens.

 

For example in columbia Coca-Cola has often times hired thugs with guns to assinate labour leaders,or get rid of workers who are attempting to unionize.

 

In any event lets pretend that the Robber Barons never took the law into there own hand,and instead relied on the government to break up strikes. Because even if only the government got involved you would still need to explain why the workers were so unhappy with there working conditions.

Why did the Workers riot in the first place?

Because they wanted a free lunch and thought theft and violence was a good way to get it.

 "The plans differ; the planners are all alike"

-Bastiat

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 100 Contributor
Male
Posts 304
Points 3,965
Solomon replied on Sun, Aug 24 2008 9:41 PM

Lisa Hayes:

Since when does anyone have the right to tell someone to get off my property and enforce that right with the threat of force?

 

That's precisely what a property right is.

Diminishing Marginal Utility - IT'S THE LAW!

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 2,452
Points 39,370
Moderator

Lisa Hayes:
//He/she doesnt have that right, but he/she does have the right to get them the hell off his/her property.//

 Since when did you get decide who has the right to X or not do X.

Ok then, let's play it your way. How do you think rights obtain?

 

Lisa Hayes:
Since when does anyone have the right to tell someone to get off my property and enforce that right with the threat of force?

So you don't think you have the right to tell someone not to hit you? Interesting. Let me beat the crap out of you and see how that works for you, ok? We'll see just how fast you change your tune, hypocrite.

 

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
Male
Posts 175
Points 4,190
ChaseCola replied on Sun, Aug 24 2008 9:43 PM

Lisa Hayes:

//He/she doesnt have that right, but he/she does have the right to get them the hell off his/her property.//

 

Since when did you get decide who has the right to X or not do X.

 

Since when does anyone have the right to tell someone to get off my property and enforce that right with the threat of force?

 

In that case, you wouldn't mind if I came and took the computer you are typing on. After all, since when did you get the right to decide who has the right to do x or not to do x.

 "The plans differ; the planners are all alike"

-Bastiat

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,247
Points 65,050
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
SystemAdministrator

Since when did you get decide who has the right to X or not do X.

One could ask you that too, since you're the one making grandiose moral claims here. You're the one who has the burden of proof here and don't evey try wriggle out of it. You're the one claiming you have a right to dictate how others may make use of their bodies and by extension their property. Please don't pretend to be on some moral high ground when you're not.

Since when does anyone have the right to tell someone to get off my property and enforce that right with the threat of force?

Wait, so can I come right now into your room, smash it up, recite Shakespeare or do whatever I want or will you object? If the latter, you're being a dishonest socialist hack.

-Jon

To darkness I condemn you...

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 31
Points 1,115

Finding qualified, trained/trainable labour isn't exactly automatic either.  Good employees don't grow on trees, that is why they make a premium over their coworkers, or leave and start their own businesses.

 

I agree,but employers can be inovated by employing labor saving devices in order to reduce the need for labor. A famous example of this is the cotton gin.

 

leave and start theire own businesses?

 

Not everyone can do that,or is skilled enough to do so. More importantly though not everyone earns enough to do such a thing.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 2,452
Points 39,370
Moderator

Lisa Hayes:
Finding qualified, trained/trainable labour isn't exactly automatic either.  Good employees don't grow on trees, that is why they make a premium over their coworkers, or leave and start their own businesses.

 

I agree,but employers can be inovated by employing labor saving devices in order to reduce the need for labor. A famous example of this is the cotton gin.

 

leave and start theire own businesses?

 

Not everyone can do that,or is skilled enough to do so. More importantly though not everyone earns enough to do such a thing.

Sucks to be them.

And on a side note: would it trouble you to learn proper quoting procedures?

 

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 31
Points 1,115

//You're the one claiming you have a right to dictate how others may make use of their bodies and by extension their property.//

 

No i am not. All i am saying is that the Robber Barons mistreated there workers.

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,247
Points 65,050
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
SystemAdministrator

The funny thing is it is probably her (his?) cherished "regulatory" and "welfare" schemes that are to blame for it in the first place...

-Jon

To darkness I condemn you...

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,247
Points 65,050
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
SystemAdministrator

Go back and read your own posts, then. BTW, implicit in the way you use the notion of mistreatment you are asserting one has the right not to be mistreated. Thus your question continues to ring hollow.

-Jon

To darkness I condemn you...

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 31
Points 1,115

<Sucks to be them.>

 

Yes i know it must suck to be apart of the large portion of the population.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 2,452
Points 39,370
Moderator

Ok: bored now. Troll too dumb to feed any further.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 2 of 6 (112 items) < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last » | RSS

Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528

Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119

contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises

Mises.org sitemap