The Mises Community
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Editing posts

Latest post Sun, Apr 6 2008 10:28 AM by mr_anonymous. 15 replies.
  • Sun, Mar 30 2008 9:17 AM

    • Spideynw
    • Top 50 Contributor
      Male
    • Joined on Wed, Dec 19 2007
    • Salt Lake City, UT
    • Posts 269
    • Points 5,810

    Editing posts

    There should not be a time limit on editing posts.

     "Most voters know nothing about how markets work—or even that they work..." Sheldon Richman

    • Post Points: 20
  • Sun, Mar 30 2008 11:01 AM In reply to

    • Junker
    • Top 150 Contributor
    • Joined on Sat, Oct 20 2007
    • MT
    • Posts 55
    • Points 675

    Re: Editing posts

    So it is at other forums I visit. It's convenience remains unlimited and seldom produces difficulties. So yes, I'm for it.

    If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face—forever.
    • Post Points: 20
  • Sun, Mar 30 2008 11:59 AM In reply to

    • Ego
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on Sun, Mar 23 2008
    • I've been chased away by vicious forum bugs!
    • Posts 849
    • Points 17,195

    Re: Editing posts

    I agree.

    Instead of disabling editing after a certain period of time, just automatically add, "This post was edited on [date/time]" at the beginning of each post. This way, readers will be informed that the post may have been edited after someone responded.

    Don't allow leftists to play games with definitions! Some of the libertarian-leaning leftists at this forum will try to redefine "left-wing" back to its original defition (Third Estate, limited government, free-markets, laissez-faire reforms, etc.). Fine! We non-leftists can't stop them from using their own personal definitions; they can use whatever labels they want to describe any concept they want.

    However, they have the audacity to then use their personal definition of "left-wing" (remember, the original definition, which is no longer valid) to prove that modern leftists are more libertarian than modern rightists! They will say that libertarianism is "inherently leftist" (again, using the original, no longer valid definition), and use that to insist that we should prefer and side with modern leftists over modern rightists.

    Question their motives.

    • Post Points: 20
  • Tue, Apr 1 2008 2:56 AM In reply to

    • Nitroadict
    • Top 25 Contributor
      Male
    • Joined on Mon, Jan 7 2008
    • Bored & Extremely Dangerous
    • Posts 490
    • Points 7,745

    Re: Editing posts

    I'm not so sure.  I'm used to the way it is now, and while I know it would be silly for me to worry about revisionism amid posts, I think it would get a bit complex it trying to keep up with posts that are forever editable. 

    However, I do think it would help threads alive, somewhat.  It would add another option to adding to the discussion.  So I suppose I say "yea".  

    • Post Points: 20
  • Tue, Apr 1 2008 12:11 PM In reply to

    • Spideynw
    • Top 50 Contributor
      Male
    • Joined on Wed, Dec 19 2007
    • Salt Lake City, UT
    • Posts 269
    • Points 5,810

    Re: Editing posts

    Nitroadict:
    think it would get a bit complex it trying to keep up with posts that are forever editable. 

    It isn't.  I am a member of my350z.com, and they used to have a time limit on editing posts.  It is much better now that they got rid of it.

     "Most voters know nothing about how markets work—or even that they work..." Sheldon Richman

    • Post Points: 20
  • Wed, Apr 2 2008 6:12 PM In reply to

    • HeroicLife
    • Top 50 Contributor
      Male
    • Joined on Tue, Jul 17 2007
    • Dallas, Texas
    • Posts 200
    • Points 3,930

    Re: Editing posts

    We can discuss the lock-out period, but what valid reason would you have for editing a post after a long time?

    • Post Points: 20
  • Thu, Apr 3 2008 1:02 AM In reply to

    • Spideynw
    • Top 50 Contributor
      Male
    • Joined on Wed, Dec 19 2007
    • Salt Lake City, UT
    • Posts 269
    • Points 5,810

    Re: Editing posts

     And I would ask what valid reason is there to not allow someone to change a post indefinitely?

    Regardless though, let's say someone writes a "how to" post, and a year later finds out something new, and people like to refer to the post, and so this person updates the post with new information, so eveyrone does not have to be notified of a new post and have to try and find it.  I don't know.  I am sure there are plenty of reasons why someone may change their post at a later date.

    Also, if someone quotes a post, and someone changes their post after it is quoted, everyone can see that it was changed.

     "Most voters know nothing about how markets work—or even that they work..." Sheldon Richman

    • Post Points: 35
  • Thu, Apr 3 2008 2:34 AM In reply to

    • Ego
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on Sun, Mar 23 2008
    • I've been chased away by vicious forum bugs!
    • Posts 849
    • Points 17,195

    Re: Editing posts

    Yeah, I see a glaring typo on an old-but-active thread of mine! I want to edit it away!


    Don't allow leftists to play games with definitions! Some of the libertarian-leaning leftists at this forum will try to redefine "left-wing" back to its original defition (Third Estate, limited government, free-markets, laissez-faire reforms, etc.). Fine! We non-leftists can't stop them from using their own personal definitions; they can use whatever labels they want to describe any concept they want.

    However, they have the audacity to then use their personal definition of "left-wing" (remember, the original definition, which is no longer valid) to prove that modern leftists are more libertarian than modern rightists! They will say that libertarianism is "inherently leftist" (again, using the original, no longer valid definition), and use that to insist that we should prefer and side with modern leftists over modern rightists.

    Question their motives.

    • Post Points: 5
  • Thu, Apr 3 2008 3:58 PM In reply to

    • HeroicLife
    • Top 50 Contributor
      Male
    • Joined on Tue, Jul 17 2007
    • Dallas, Texas
    • Posts 200
    • Points 3,930

    Re: Editing posts

    Spideynw:
    nd I would ask what valid reason is there to not allow someone to change a post indefinitely?

    Intellectual honesty.  Just like in real life, if someone says something they later regret, they should not be able to change history. 

    Spideynw:
    Regardless though, let's say someone writes a "how to" post, and a year later finds out something new, and people like to refer to the post, and so this person updates the post with new information, so eveyrone does not have to be notified of a new post and have to try and find it.

    A forum is not the right place for this kind of information.  You can add an additional post, which would also notify others that there is something new on a thread.

    • Post Points: 35
  • Thu, Apr 3 2008 4:40 PM In reply to

    • Spideynw
    • Top 50 Contributor
      Male
    • Joined on Wed, Dec 19 2007
    • Salt Lake City, UT
    • Posts 269
    • Points 5,810

    Re: Editing posts

    HeroicLife:

    Intellectual honesty.  Just like in real life, if someone says something they later regret, they should not be able to change history. 

     

    In real life, if someone says something they later regret, they can clarify and correct it.  But hey, if you would rather people take up more space by adding more posts, then that is your choice.

    Regardless, it is my experience that people like forums more that allow people to change their posts at anytime.

     "Most voters know nothing about how markets work—or even that they work..." Sheldon Richman

    • Post Points: 5
  • Thu, Apr 3 2008 4:47 PM In reply to

    • Ego
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on Sun, Mar 23 2008
    • I've been chased away by vicious forum bugs!
    • Posts 849
    • Points 17,195

    Re: Editing posts

    What if you place a large warning on each post that was edited late? I think it would improve over-all writing quality if you allow posts to be edited forever. If someone sees a post they made earlier in the thread with a stupid typo, they can correct it.

    For example:

    Imagine this in larger, red text:

    This post was last edited on [date/time]; it may not reflect the original post.

    Don't allow leftists to play games with definitions! Some of the libertarian-leaning leftists at this forum will try to redefine "left-wing" back to its original defition (Third Estate, limited government, free-markets, laissez-faire reforms, etc.). Fine! We non-leftists can't stop them from using their own personal definitions; they can use whatever labels they want to describe any concept they want.

    However, they have the audacity to then use their personal definition of "left-wing" (remember, the original definition, which is no longer valid) to prove that modern leftists are more libertarian than modern rightists! They will say that libertarianism is "inherently leftist" (again, using the original, no longer valid definition), and use that to insist that we should prefer and side with modern leftists over modern rightists.

    Question their motives.

    • Post Points: 20
  • Sat, Apr 5 2008 4:18 AM In reply to

    Re: Editing posts

    Yeah, I always add an:

    ------edit------

    That way if someone posts something that is revelant while I'm composting my thoughts I don't have to double post.

    Unless it's just a simple typo or something.

    I post a lot on another forum with no editing and it just sucks

    But I'm fine with a time limit but then again I don't post a whole lot over here so it doesn't effect me as much as others.

    ----real edit----

    Then I went playing around with the user's stats page and found out I'm #10 in number of posts...

    • Post Points: 20
  • Sat, Apr 5 2008 9:31 PM In reply to

    • HeroicLife
    • Top 50 Contributor
      Male
    • Joined on Tue, Jul 17 2007
    • Dallas, Texas
    • Posts 200
    • Points 3,930

    Re: Editing posts

    I have requested that the developers allow me to make the edit date/note mandatory  - if they do, I will consider making posts editable indefinately.

    • Post Points: 35
  • Sat, Apr 5 2008 10:08 PM In reply to

    • Ego
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on Sun, Mar 23 2008
    • I've been chased away by vicious forum bugs!
    • Posts 849
    • Points 17,195

    Re: Editing posts

    Wow, thanks! Smile

    Don't allow leftists to play games with definitions! Some of the libertarian-leaning leftists at this forum will try to redefine "left-wing" back to its original defition (Third Estate, limited government, free-markets, laissez-faire reforms, etc.). Fine! We non-leftists can't stop them from using their own personal definitions; they can use whatever labels they want to describe any concept they want.

    However, they have the audacity to then use their personal definition of "left-wing" (remember, the original definition, which is no longer valid) to prove that modern leftists are more libertarian than modern rightists! They will say that libertarianism is "inherently leftist" (again, using the original, no longer valid definition), and use that to insist that we should prefer and side with modern leftists over modern rightists.

    Question their motives.

    • Post Points: 5
  • Sun, Apr 6 2008 9:23 AM In reply to

    • Spideynw
    • Top 50 Contributor
      Male
    • Joined on Wed, Dec 19 2007
    • Salt Lake City, UT
    • Posts 269
    • Points 5,810

    Re: Editing posts

     Awesome!

     "Most voters know nothing about how markets work—or even that they work..." Sheldon Richman

    • Post Points: 20
  • Sun, Apr 6 2008 10:28 AM In reply to

    Re: Editing posts

     Sounds good.

    ...And nobody has ever taught you how to live out on the street, But now you're gonna have to get used to it...

    • Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (16 items) | RSS

Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528

Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119

contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises

Mises.org sitemap