The Mises Community
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Who was the worst president?

rated by 0 users
This post has 112 Replies | 33 Followers

Top 75 Contributor
Male
Posts 431
Points 7,900

Adam Martin:

Coolidge presided over the 20's, when the Federal Reserve pumped massive amounts of credit into the system. I don't think he can be called a good president.

Yeah but the Fed would have done that regardless of who was in office.

Semper Fidelis

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 75 Contributor
Male
Posts 512
Points 9,510
Dondoolee replied on Wed, Mar 25 2009 4:47 PM

Is there a site one can go to to see how many military and civilian deaths (on both sides preferably) were caused by president's military actions?

 Let us look then and see, how they manage their concerns- they for whose cause we are to labor, devote ourselves, and grow enthusiastic

 -Max Stirner, The Ego and His Own

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,501
Points 28,695
Moderator

Dondoolee:

I think it is far to early to rank obama as one of the worst ten yet.  If he has implemented some bone headed policies thier full effects have yet to be felt, plus he hasn't drafted yet nor killed as many people as his past 3 predecessors yet.  I still don't think he has reached the heights of TR, FDR, Truman, LBJ or Wilson yet by a long shot.

 Obama has and will spend more money in his first 100 days in office than Bush Junior possibly could in two years.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 574
Points 9,290
Moderator
Natalie replied on Mon, May 4 2009 2:53 PM

He has to deal with Bush's mess. As I've said before, it's Hoover and Roosevelt all over again. Only worse, considering America is already involved everywhere and spends gazillions on military.

If I hear not allowed much oftener; said Sam, I'm going to get angry.

J.R.R.Tolkien, The Lord of the Rings

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 88
Points 1,105
Justin D replied on Mon, May 25 2009 10:00 PM

^And people have credit cards and unemployment and welfare keeps people from working, and all the obligations of fdic and bailouts. Plus entitlement costs. Student loan debt for young people and even established people in 100ks. Commercial real estate, failing landlords have more taxes obligations then before.

 

Yeah, the 30s would be cake compared to a real collapse now. At least those pennies you found were worth something.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 51
Points 965
Erickk replied on Tue, May 26 2009 8:57 AM

As a foreigner, I oppose you guys' hatred against Truman. Think about how many East Europeans he saved from Soviet Totalitarianism.

Obama #1, FDR #2, Bush & Wilson #3

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 837
Points 13,655
MacFall replied on Tue, May 26 2009 9:15 AM

Erickk:

Think about how many East Europeans he saved from Soviet Totalitarianism.

Not a damn one.

Pro Christo et Libertate integre!

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Male
Posts 512
Points 9,510
Dondoolee replied on Tue, May 26 2009 11:54 AM

Erickk:

As a foreigner, I oppose you guys' hatred against Truman. Think about how many East Europeans he saved from Soviet Totalitarianism.

Obama #1, FDR #2, Bush & Wilson #3

 

Think of how many Japanese civilians he distegrated to save the Japanese from totalitarianism.  Or how many US Citizens he drafted and killed to save half of Korea from totalitarianism.

 Let us look then and see, how they manage their concerns- they for whose cause we are to labor, devote ourselves, and grow enthusiastic

 -Max Stirner, The Ego and His Own

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 88
Points 1,105
Justin D replied on Wed, May 27 2009 11:28 AM

Kill some Japanese for the indirect undetermined sake of some Soviets? Surely cause of praises.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 51
Points 965
Erickk replied on Wed, May 27 2009 3:45 PM

I think without the two A Bombs, the war will persist at least some months longer with more and more Chinese died.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 51
Points 965
Erickk replied on Wed, May 27 2009 3:56 PM

Sorry, but there would be many people fell into Stalin's sphere of influence. If Truman did not act then the British probably would withdraw with no reinforcement for Greece. Moreover, the Truman Doctrine did make the Red Tsar back down a little bit. He made concessions on Turkey and due to his misconception that the capitalist powers would destroy each other, (in this case Stalin was in fact expecting the British would fight the Americans. Some words in Truman's speech to "scare the hell out of the American people" seemed to confirm Stalin his false belief) he did not make big moves until Marshall Plan was confirmed to him.

Furthermore, if the Americans did not intervene into Europe, really Stalin would someday take advantage of this vacuum.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 787
Points 13,395
banned replied on Wed, May 27 2009 4:00 PM

The japanese military was killing people in china, so the solution is to nuke a bunch of japanese civilians? Great stratagy.

  • | Post Points: 50
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 837
Points 13,655
MacFall replied on Wed, May 27 2009 5:05 PM

banned:

The japanese military was killing people in china, so the solution is to nuke a bunch of japanese civilians? Great stratagy.

Sounds like typical statist rationale - we need a monopoly gang to violate rights in order to prevent the violation of rights. The only organization that can prevent theft must steal to exist. Murdering civilians is necessary to prevent the murder of civilians. War is peace, freedom is slavery, etc.

Pro Christo et Libertate integre!

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 150 Contributor
Male
Posts 245
Points 4,900
Ansury replied on Thu, May 28 2009 5:40 PM

I like Parsidius' list, although I'd be fine with Bush II in place of Clinton, or tied.  Mainly because he did much of the same stuff Clinton did-- times a factor of 5 or 10.

That is funny how they have a pattern isn't it?  The least Obama could have done was think of a NEW buzzword, instead of recycling "New Deal".... but I guess green recycling trends are "in" nowadays huh?  

He could have even combined "New Deal/Great Society" and called his program "New Society" (i.e. a socialist and fascist one) or "Great Deal" (for all his friends, political allies, and special interests).

(Edit: Oh wow, 5 pages huh? Guess I'm late! Stick out tongue)

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,809
Points 49,940
Moderator

The worst president:

 

Jefferson

'It is difficult to imagine any normal person wishing to meet Marx for a third time.' - Alexander Gray, The Socialist Tradition

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
Male
Posts 245
Points 4,900
Ansury replied on Sun, May 31 2009 9:00 PM

Laughing Man:

The worst president:

 

Jefferson

 Uh, why?

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,809
Points 49,940
Moderator

He was like Ronald Reagan, wonderful rherotic, horrible application.

'It is difficult to imagine any normal person wishing to meet Marx for a third time.' - Alexander Gray, The Socialist Tradition

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
Male
Posts 245
Points 4,900
Ansury replied on Sun, May 31 2009 9:12 PM

Laughing Man:

He was like Ronald Reagan, wonderful rherotic, horrible application.

 Fair enough I guess, but I'm still gonna have to go with the likes of FDR, Wilson, Lincoln, etc.!

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,809
Points 49,940
Moderator

Ansury:
Fair enough I guess, but I'm still gonna have to go with the likes of FDR, Wilson, Lincoln, etc.!

But we expect that from statists. I feel it is much more devastating for a 'libertarian' to become a 'statesman' then a statist.

'It is difficult to imagine any normal person wishing to meet Marx for a third time.' - Alexander Gray, The Socialist Tradition

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,929
Points 36,460
Spideynw replied on Sun, May 31 2009 10:05 PM

Laughing Man:

Ansury:
Fair enough I guess, but I'm still gonna have to go with the likes of FDR, Wilson, Lincoln, etc.!

But we expect that from statists. I feel it is much more devastating for a 'libertarian' to become a 'statesman' then a statist.

Didn't Lincoln have a lot of libertarian rhetoric?

At most, 5% of the population would need to stop complying to bring down the government.

  • | Post Points: 20
Page 5 of 6 (113 items) « First ... < Previous 2 3 4 5 6 Next > | RSS

Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528

Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119

contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises

Mises.org sitemap