In reading my Intro Huamnities textbook, I cam upon the following passage:
The economic philosopher Adam Smith (17-1790) believed that the perfect society was one in which all the people were free to pursue their self-interest.
I'm no expert on Adam Smith, that seems to be a mischaracterization. Did he really believe that that was how a "perfect society" would be?
The textbook then goes on to state that Adam Smith failed to predict that firms would collude, case in point being OPEC. But isn't open a cartel of governments, not private firms?
Edit: The passage is from my Humanities textbook, not my Art History textbook.
My favorite online shop: www.cafepress.com/libertyphile
Dude, its an art history book......
Where there is no property there is no justice; a proposition as certain as any demonstration in Euclid
Fools! not to see that what they madly desire would be a calamity to them as no hands but their own could bring
nirgrahamUK: Dude, its an art history book......
They don't research?
Economic Thought (Latest Post): How Not To Make Globalization Work
Ad hominem! You're attacking the book itself instead of its argument. Anyway, I'm surprised by the amount of economics found my social sciences courses, particularly, Intro to Humanities and Art History and Philosophy. I think most college students learn their economics from the non-strictly economics, social science courses. Btw, I made a mistake. The passage is from my Humanities textbook.
Daniel: The textbook then goes on to state that Adam Smith failed to predict that firms would collude, case in point being OPEC.
The textbook then goes on to state that Adam Smith failed to predict that firms would collude, case in point being OPEC.
That's just wrong all over the place. First, you're right that OPEC can't be considered a cartel of private firms. But also Smith thought collusion DOES happen all the time...
"People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices." (Wealth of Nations)
Human Action Comics Issues 1-6
Daniel: Anyway, I'm surprised by the amount of economics found my social sciences courses, particularly, Intro to Humanities and Art History and Philosophy. I think most college students learn their economics from the non-strictly economics, social science courses.
Anyway, I'm surprised by the amount of economics found my social sciences courses, particularly, Intro to Humanities and Art History and Philosophy. I think most college students learn their economics from the non-strictly economics, social science courses.
Surprised, really? I would take it for granted. Most teachers like to insinuate their irrelevent, stupid beliefs into their classes.
Humanities Textbook: The economic philosopher Adam Smith (17-1790) believed that the perfect society was one in which all the people were free to pursue their self-interest.
So humanities professors think Adam Smith was a 1773 year old utopian egoist. No wonder they are so able to engage with his ideas in a coherent fashion.
"I cannot prove, but am prepared to affirm, that if you take care of clarity in reasoning, most good causes will take care of themselves, while some bad ones are taken care of as a matter of course." -Anthony de Jasay
Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528
Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119
contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises
Mises.org sitemap