The Mises Community
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

How to Make New Libertarians/An-caps/Austrians Economists

rated by 0 users
This post has 24 Replies | 2 Followers

Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,466
Points 24,470
Daniel Posted: Sun, Nov 1 2009 1:26 PM

 

  1. Have babies. Many of them: 3, 5, 7, or even 12.
  2. Home school and raise them as libertarians/an-caps/Austrians economists.
  3. Encourage your children to do the same.

 

I swear to you that this is probably more effective than debating your college professors, your classmates, your local politicians, etc. Btw, I think Peter Schiff might be the most famous example.

My favorite online shop: www.cafepress.com/libertyphile Big Smile

  • | Post Points: 80
Top 150 Contributor
Male
Posts 226
Points 3,795

Good advice from "big" tobacco: Hook 'em while their young.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 1,308
Points 23,625

You are not raising anyone to be austrian economist.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 118
Points 1,795
Nielsio replied on Tue, Nov 3 2009 7:39 AM

I think there are some steps missing before 1.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,466
Points 24,470
Daniel replied on Tue, Nov 3 2009 12:51 PM

scineram:
You are not raising anyone to be austrian economist.

If that were true, so what?

Nielsio:
I think there are some steps missing before 1.

For example? I suppose you could adopt kids too.

Stranger:
And then what?

Perhaps the world would be a better place.

My favorite online shop: www.cafepress.com/libertyphile Big Smile

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 2,612
Points 46,260

Daniel:
Perhaps the world would be a better place.

I don't see any reason it would.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 7,643
Points 132,750
MVP
SystemAdministrator

Stranger:
I don't see any reason it would.

That's a shame.

If you find something evil that wobbles, push it. - Gary North

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 2,612
Points 46,260

The idea that the world is better just because there is a greater quantity of people is a very socialistic concept.

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 100 Contributor
Male
Posts 370
Points 4,730
Saan replied on Tue, Nov 3 2009 1:55 PM

Problem is, at least in the US.  Marriage means the state backs up a woman if she wants to control a mans life decisions.

Women aren't bad it's just that power corrupts.  Gotta do something about that.

 "...The post-totalitarian system contrives to force life into its most probable states...This system serves people only to the extent necessary to ensure that people will serve it

Vaclav Havel

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 7,643
Points 132,750
MVP
SystemAdministrator

Stranger:

The idea that the world is better just because there is a greater quantity of people is a very socialistic concept.

That's not the idea.  The idea is that the world is better because there are a greater quantity of people with better ideas.

If you find something evil that wobbles, push it. - Gary North

  • | Post Points: 35
Not Ranked
Posts 27
Points 405

You are forgetting one vital thing - kids rebel against their parents.  Homeschool them all to be Austrian thinkers and they´ll elope when they are 16 to join a Keynesian reading circle :D

 

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 2,612
Points 46,260

liberty student:

Stranger:

The idea that the world is better just because there is a greater quantity of people is a very socialistic concept.

That's not the idea.  The idea is that the world is better because there are a greater quantity of people with better ideas.

You're not weighing out the cost. If Austrians start having families with 10 kids, they don't have the time to organize meetings, community groups, websites, write books, and so on. They can't invest in the capital of the movement.

Plus, historically speaking, evangelism is a much more effective activity.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 7,643
Points 132,750
MVP
SystemAdministrator

Stranger:

You're not weighing out the cost. If Austrians start having families with 10 kids, they don't have the time to organize meetings, community groups, websites, write books, and so on. They can't invest in the capital of the movement.

Plus, historically speaking, evangelism is a much more effective activity.

I think we are talking about two different things.  I wasn't supporting the large family idea.  I thought you were contesting the idea that having numbers on our side wasn't enough.  Misunderstanding, probably my fault.

If you find something evil that wobbles, push it. - Gary North

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,466
Points 24,470
Daniel replied on Tue, Nov 3 2009 2:58 PM

Stranger:

The idea that the world is better just because there is a greater quantity of people is a very socialistic concept.

Even if it was socialist, so what? Oh, and the point is there would more libertarians/an-caps/AEs.

 

Saan:

Problem is, at least in the US.  Marriage means the state backs up a woman if she wants to control a mans life decisions.

Women aren't bad it's just that power corrupts.  Gotta do something about that.

Good point. What's the divorce rate among libertarians/an-caps/AEs?

Stranger:

You're not weighing out the cost. If Austrians start having families with 10 kids, they don't have the time to organize meetings, community groups, websites, write books, and so on. They can't invest in the capital of the movement.

Plus, historically speaking, evangelism is a much more effective activity.

Tom Woods. Ron Paul. No, they don't  have ten kids, but they had big families. Bigger than the 2.4 kids per family average. Also, division of labor. Not everyone can be a Ron Paul, Tom Woods, Walter Block, etc. Some of us may be better at having kids and raising them to be libertarians/an-caps/AEs than at writing books, teaching, etc. 

 

My favorite online shop: www.cafepress.com/libertyphile Big Smile

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,814
Points 50,100
Moderator

I think Thomas Woods has a child for every book he publishes or publishes a book for every child. Stick out tongue

I remember him saying at an author's forum. He was talking to Hoppe and said 'Yea I seem to be having a child for every book I publish' and Hoppe with his german accent said 'Ya you can't keep that going'

'It is difficult to imagine any normal person wishing to meet Marx for a third time.' - Alexander Gray, The Socialist Tradition

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
Male
Posts 205
Points 4,480

Did Murray Rothbard have any children?

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,814
Points 50,100
Moderator

Sukrit Sabhlok:

Did Murray Rothbard have any children?

Biologically? No

Intellectually? Yes

And honestly, if we are constantly comparing ourselves with Rothbard then we are never going to meet the mark. Comparing yourself to Rothbard runs dangerously close to engaging in the Nirvana fallacy.

'It is difficult to imagine any normal person wishing to meet Marx for a third time.' - Alexander Gray, The Socialist Tradition

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 7,643
Points 132,750
MVP
SystemAdministrator

Laughing Man:
Biologically? No

I thought Murray Rothbard did have one child.

If you find something evil that wobbles, push it. - Gary North

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 213
Points 3,805

Why does many a man write? Because he does not possess enough character not to write. ---Karl Kraus.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 2 (25 items) 1 2 Next > | RSS

Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528

Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119

contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises

Mises.org sitemap