The Mises Community
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Ridiculous Claims Thread

rated by 0 users
This post has 45 Replies | 9 Followers

Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 63
Points 1,890
Blueline976 Posted: Mon, Oct 26 2009 5:42 PM

Sometimes I can't believe what I'm hearing/seeing. I'm sure this happens to some of you.

So, in order to vent some frustrations, why not have a thread consisting of the most ridiculous claims of libertarianism?

I'll begin:

  • We had libertarianism in the late 19th century, which lead to worker exploitation and bubble/bust cycles.
  • Toxic waste dumps, polluted air, and Hurricane Katrina situations would become rampant.
  • Government came to the rescue, saving children oppressed under evil "child labor."
  • Libertarian "pseudo-economics" will be a disaster

If a thread like this exists/has existed already...Oh well lol

A cynic is a man who, when he smells flowers, looks around for a coffin. - H.L. Mencken

  • | Post Points: 245
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,503
Points 28,705
Moderator

If the United States had a free market, many Americans would starve to death.

Related ridiculous claims are:

  • Without minimum wages or unions, many people would be paid extremely low wages.
  • Without work-safety regulations, people would be forced to work in dangerous conditions.
  • Without working hour regulations, everyone would have to work 80+ hours a week.
  • Without Social Security, nobody would ever be able to retire.
  • Without Medicare, the elderly would die off.
  • Without Medicaid and welfare, the poor would starve to death and/or die from lack of medical care.
  • Without medical licensure, everyone would die from attending unregulated doctors.
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 200 Contributor
Male
Posts 152
Points 2,305
Giant_Joe replied on Mon, Oct 26 2009 5:52 PM

If it weren't for government, there'd be no roads!

The appeal to "charity" is a truly ironic one. First, it is hardly "charity" to take wealth by force and hand it over to someone else. -Rothbard

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,929
Points 36,460
Spideynw replied on Mon, Oct 26 2009 5:53 PM

If it were not for the government, many things would not have been accomplished, like getting phone lines out to the boonies.

At most, 5% of the population would need to stop complying to bring down the government.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 40
Points 500

That the current economic situation proves that "free markets" (and therefore libertarianism) have been proven not to work!

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,465
Points 24,465
Daniel replied on Mon, Oct 26 2009 6:10 PM

The Fed is a free market institution.

Ron Paul is a neoliberal.

Government shrank from Reagan till Bush II.

We're all equal.

My favorite online shop: www.cafepress.com/libertyphile Big Smile

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,809
Points 49,985
Moderator

If the government didn't get involved in the Progressive era, we would all be crawling around in the mud while the capitalists exploited us with ever decreasing wages.

'It is difficult to imagine any normal person wishing to meet Marx for a third time.' - Alexander Gray, The Socialist Tradition

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 707
Points 12,535
Snowflake replied on Mon, Oct 26 2009 6:18 PM

The separation of powers in the constitution provides a system of checks and balances on government.

If you legalized drugs, everyone would do them all the time and society would collapse.

That mainstream news is not an oxymoron.

 

"It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But the half-wit remains a half-wit and the emperor remains an emperor." ~Dream

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,465
Points 24,465
Daniel replied on Mon, Oct 26 2009 6:33 PM

That Wikipedia is a bad source for your college papers. Just ignore the all the references at the bottom of the Wiki page.

That government stats are reliable.

My favorite online shop: www.cafepress.com/libertyphile Big Smile

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 187
Points 3,085
Seph replied on Mon, Oct 26 2009 7:09 PM

Daniel:
Government shrank from Reagan till Bush II.

I've had teachers state, as an absolute fact, that the US has been moving towards limited government and deregulation since Reagan. 

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 52
Points 900

Here's a few:

  • The economic crisis in which we are now in was caused by deregulation
  • The economic crisis is now over
  • We are now in recovery mode
  • Government debt is "owed to ourselves"
  • Austria's GDP is small in comparison to any major power, and, therefore, its economists must be irrelevant
  • Without the U.S. military engaged in numerous foreign excursions, we would have been attacked again

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 657
Points 10,365
filc replied on Mon, Oct 26 2009 7:35 PM

Government builds and maintains the interwebs. Without them we couldn't Google!

Statism is a religion.

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Male
Posts 16
Points 180

If government did not monopolize utility provision (electricity, gas, water, landline and cable service), we would suffer from monopoly utility providers.

"I am a sinner who does not expect forgiveness - but I am not a government official." - Francis Wolcott, Deadwood

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 707
Points 12,535
Snowflake replied on Mon, Oct 26 2009 7:52 PM

Zach_the_Lizard:
The economic crisis is now over
Major media outlets aren't even reporting on the economy. ccn.com and foxnews.com don't have the words "economy" or "recovery" in their front pages.

Apparently cnn thinks that armstrong's battle with cancer and a rape case are more important. Fox news thinks that 5 year old bodybuilders and Sandra Bullock's (who is this?) battle with a pornstar is more newsworthy.

Sheesh.

"It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But the half-wit remains a half-wit and the emperor remains an emperor." ~Dream

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 200 Contributor
Male
Posts 142
Points 2,120
Praetyre replied on Mon, Oct 26 2009 7:55 PM

I'm firmly convinced swine flu was a story deliberately blown up to distract people from the failure of Keynesian economics. It came at an awfully convenient time and went away a few months later, despite people screaming it would be the Apocalypse.

As for ridiculous claims..

  • Herbert Hoover was a laissez faire capitalist, and Roosevelt fixed the economy.
  • Patents and intellectual property encourage innovation
  • George W. Bush was a laissez faire capitalist
  • The Group of 20 is a radical capitalist institution
  • The US healthcare system is free market
  • If the government hadn't bailed out (insert politically connected corporation here), the economy would collapse!
  • We are freer now than we were 100 years ago
  • Without government education, we would not have an educated workforce!
  • Frankly, virtually anything with the words "social", "public", "national" or "interest".
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 7,643
Points 132,750
MVP
SystemAdministrator

People can't be trusted to run their own lives, but politicians and bureaucrats can be trusted to run those lives for them.

Aggression is necessary in order to protect rights and property.

Without IP no one would create anything.

Democracy is freedom.

"I am a libertarian, but I think we need some sort of government"

Objective law

If you find something evil that wobbles, push it. - Gary North

  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Male
Posts 16
Points 180

People can't be trusted to run their own lives, but politicians and bureaucrats can be trusted to run those lives for them.

And the sister claim: People are inherently stupid and irrational (and/or violent), therefore we need the state. Which is run by people...

"I am a sinner who does not expect forgiveness - but I am not a government official." - Francis Wolcott, Deadwood

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,503
Points 28,705
Moderator

^ I find that one especially annoying: "People are irrational, so we need the state." But the state is run by irrational people who can impose their irrational rules on everyone, including the rational, thereby forcing the rational to be irrational.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 679
Points 11,830
Esuric replied on Mon, Oct 26 2009 11:13 PM
  • The free market is a theoretical construct.
  • The exploitation theory of interest is valid, but the LTV is not.
  • Socialism is defined as an economic system where the 'workers' own the means of production.
  •  Human beings are 'social animals.'
  • There are no economic laws, just specific historical phenomena. 
  • Human beings are stupid, and therefore irrational.
  • Ludwig von Mises and Hayek merely tried to defend their bourgeois ideologies, and failed.
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
Male
Posts 239
Points 3,960

India is a poor country, 60 years after independence, because the British looted all our wealth before granting us independence.

Banks can't lend money under 100% reserve banking.

  • | Post Points: 20
Page 1 of 3 (46 items) 1 2 3 Next > | RSS

Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528

Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119

contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises

Mises.org sitemap