The Mises Community
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Where do patents fit in, in a free market ? please read

rated by 0 users
Answered (Not Verified) This post has 0 verified answers | 35 Replies | 6 Followers

Not Ranked
4 Posts
Points 200
Jordan22473 posted on Fri, Oct 23 2009 9:41 PM

Hi I have a question for you guys and galls. Where do patents fit in in a free market ? Patents are legal property, they are similar to investments in that  you take your money or labor time and put it into developing a new product, process or in the case of an investment a corporation, then you are entitled to a retern on your investment. The purpos of a patent is to recope losses incerd during R&D as well as a way  for inovaters to profit  from what is durring the duraration of the patent there intelectual property. In an unregulated or state absent market it would be difficult for many patent holders to secure there rights ( the exclusion of others from using there patent ) , have a remidy to seek restitution from infringment, or to have the market even acnowlge the patent as bieng ligitamite. This would discorage the inovater as there would be no reward for encorring the cost of thiere inovation since the new or more efficent product or process is open to all the market to exploit. Awnsers from differnet points of view are welcomed and encouraged. Espesialy if you wold void or alter the consept of the patent.

Thanks Bye

  • | Post Points: 125

All Replies

Top 50 Contributor
Male
768 Posts
Points 14,990
AJ replied on Mon, Oct 26 2009 12:50 PM

jct181:
Patents create an economic incentive to innovate.  Why would I spend my money on R&D to develop something if somebody else can use the fruits of my labor without having incurred the costs that I was willing to spend?  Many technologies would never be discovered in the first place if there were no IP laws.  Intellectual property is property.

Counter-intuitive as it may be, almost the exact opposite is true: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_PVI6V6o-4

Think outside the monopoly paradigm. Net-based microsecession | Why anarchy hasn't worked

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
625 Posts
Points 9,920
filc replied on Mon, Oct 26 2009 2:14 PM

jct181:
Patents create an economic incentive to innovate.

nonsensical. Patents stifle innovation. IP's create legal monopolies which temporarily suspends the creation of new technology, as new technologies are built on old.

Statism is a religion.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
1,691 Posts
Points 26,900

jct181:
Patents create an economic incentive to innovate.

Monopolists have no incentive to innovate, they have a captive market. Patents create monopolies. See where this is going?

Peace
  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
18 Posts
Points 570
jct181 replied on Tue, Oct 27 2009 1:07 AM

^A poor, independent inventor who has an idea is not a monopolist.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
7,643 Posts
Points 132,720
MVP
SystemAdministrator

jct181:
^A poor, independent inventor who has an idea is not a monopolist.

By definition, if he gets a patent, he is.

Patents don't help out poor independent inventors.  They hinder them.

If you find something evil that wobbles, push it. - Gary North

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 200 Contributor
143 Posts
Points 2,905

well poverty changes everything, lol...

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 3 of 3 (36 items) < Previous 1 2 3 | RSS

Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528

Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119

contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises

Mises.org sitemap