Hi I have a question for you guys and galls. Where do patents fit in in a free market ? Patents are legal property, they are similar to investments in that you take your money or labor time and put it into developing a new product, process or in the case of an investment a corporation, then you are entitled to a retern on your investment. The purpos of a patent is to recope losses incerd during R&D as well as a way for inovaters to profit from what is durring the duraration of the patent there intelectual property. In an unregulated or state absent market it would be difficult for many patent holders to secure there rights ( the exclusion of others from using there patent ) , have a remidy to seek restitution from infringment, or to have the market even acnowlge the patent as bieng ligitamite. This would discorage the inovater as there would be no reward for encorring the cost of thiere inovation since the new or more efficent product or process is open to all the market to exploit. Awnsers from differnet points of view are welcomed and encouraged. Espesialy if you wold void or alter the consept of the patent.
Thanks Bye
jct181:Patents create an economic incentive to innovate. Why would I spend my money on R&D to develop something if somebody else can use the fruits of my labor without having incurred the costs that I was willing to spend? Many technologies would never be discovered in the first place if there were no IP laws. Intellectual property is property.
Counter-intuitive as it may be, almost the exact opposite is true: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_PVI6V6o-4
Think outside the monopoly paradigm. Net-based microsecession | Why anarchy hasn't worked
jct181:Patents create an economic incentive to innovate.
nonsensical. Patents stifle innovation. IP's create legal monopolies which temporarily suspends the creation of new technology, as new technologies are built on old.
Statism is a religion.
Monopolists have no incentive to innovate, they have a captive market. Patents create monopolies. See where this is going?
^A poor, independent inventor who has an idea is not a monopolist.
jct181:^A poor, independent inventor who has an idea is not a monopolist.
By definition, if he gets a patent, he is.
Patents don't help out poor independent inventors. They hinder them.
If you find something evil that wobbles, push it. - Gary North
well poverty changes everything, lol...
Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528
Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119
contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises
Mises.org sitemap