I don't think there is something wrong with telling someone you are an anarchist as long as you are sensible about it. I think you did the right thing with presenting Mises, because it establishes to her one of your interests. In a way, who you are. Now I would say, let her discover more by herself, if she likes it and overtime you notice that she does [ by asking questions ] then you answer her. If she doesn't like it and you want to base your relationship to some degree on politics [ which is fine ] then you tried and it simply didn't work out. I think the point you need to know is try networking at locations where people are like minded. People who enjoy the things you do [ not everything of course ].
'It is difficult to imagine any normal person wishing to meet Marx for a third time.' - Alexander Gray, The Socialist Tradition
Democracy for Breakfast:So I guess I already screwed up?
No. Just find some other things to talk about. Weather, music, travel, food, entertainment. Listen to her. Find out what she likes.
If you find something evil that wobbles, push it. - Gary North
Nah, no such thing. Just move to a topic that WILL get her thinking in that way about you. Nothing intellectual.
Think outside the monopoly paradigm. Net-based microsecession | Why anarchy hasn't worked
Snowflake, link me some stuff.
tacoface: hahahahaha champ, save the anarchy shit until youve been inside her
hahahahaha champ, save the anarchy shit until youve been inside her
A little misrepresentation and fraud never hurt anyone. Right?
Pardon?
What's the point of having a relationship with a woman? There are more efficient ways to get laid.
JackSkylark:A little misrepresentation and fraud never hurt anyone. Right?
In fact you can say thousands of lies to get into a girl's heart, and marry her. Many cultures(like mine, for example) even support it.
zefreak: Daniel: zefreak: Giles, what do you have against anarchists? Most economists at GMU are not anarchists, therefore, Giles cannot support anarchism. Lol :p Leeson is arguably an anarchist, albeit a consequentialist one.
Daniel: zefreak: Giles, what do you have against anarchists? Most economists at GMU are not anarchists, therefore, Giles cannot support anarchism. Lol :p
zefreak: Giles, what do you have against anarchists?
Giles, what do you have against anarchists?
Most economists at GMU are not anarchists, therefore, Giles cannot support anarchism. Lol :p
Leeson is arguably an anarchist, albeit a consequentialist one.
Leeson isn't arguably an anarchist. Leeson IS an anarchist.
"I cannot prove, but am prepared to affirm, that if you take care of clarity in reasoning, most good causes will take care of themselves, while some bad ones are taken care of as a matter of course." -Anthony de Jasay
JackSkylark: tacoface: hahahahaha champ, save the anarchy shit until youve been inside her A little misrepresentation and fraud never hurt anyone. Right?
Say what? Mention it briefly if she asks. Don't dwell on it until she's fascinated with the idea, and with you.
Esuric: What's the point of having a relationship with a woman? There are more efficient ways to get laid.
Because that's the sole reason to have a relationship?
The atoms tell the atoms so, for I never was or will but atoms forevermore be.
Yours sincerely,
Physiocrat
Physiocrat:Because that's the sole reason to have a relationship?
What are the other reasons?
Esuric: Physiocrat:Because that's the sole reason to have a relationship? What are the other reasons?
So you treat women as if they are a pure mechanical sex machine? Wow, and I get called a chauvinist for holding a Biblical complementarian view of men and women.
Physiocrat:So you treat women as if they are a pure mechanical sex machine? Wow, and I get called a chauvinist for holding a Biblical complementarian view of men and women.
If I want a rational intelligent discussion, I'll talk to my friends, or come here. If I want to debate a socialist, or a monetarist, I'll visit my professors during their office hours. Girls today are interested in facebook, TMZ, and getting fucked up. There's one thing that separates them from my friends.... Now, of course I'm generalizing, there are always exceptions.
Being pessimist can really drag a relationship and your sexual perfomance, the ideal man must be always capable of cracking a smile in the gloomest situation.
Physiocrat: Esuric: Physiocrat:Because that's the sole reason to have a relationship? What are the other reasons? So you treat women as if they are a pure mechanical sex machine? Wow, and I get called a chauvinist for holding a Biblical complementarian view of men and women.
You didn't answer his question.
Women are a waste of time and resources, imo. Have fun but don't take them seriously. Don't buy into the myth that you need to be with somebody in order to be normal and for god sakes don't fall into the trap that is the "american dream". You know, I'm human. I get lonely sometimes, but I have lots of friends and a decent social life. I don't feel like dating one bore after another just to find that one jewel. It's tedious.
DarkCatalyst: Women are a waste of time and resources, imo. Have fun but don't take them seriously. Don't buy into the myth that you need to be with somebody in order to be normal and for god sakes don't fall into the trap that is the "american dream". You know, I'm human. I get lonely sometimes, but I have lots of friends and a decent social life. I don't feel like dating one bore after another just to find that one jewel. It's tedious.
Well, being in a relationship, is the most intimate feeling. Even though it isn't necessary, it certainly is in high demand. Women are like capital.
The productivity of partnership, the comfort of intimacy, the joy of love, and the security and fulfillment of family.
Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528
Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119
contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises
Mises.org sitemap