The Mises Community
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

What kinds of 'enhanced awareness' methods do libertarians favor?

rated by 0 users
This post has 28 Replies | 7 Followers

Top 75 Contributor
Male
Posts 512
Points 9,510

Knight_of_BAAWA:

Democracy for Breakfast:
Its a lot more then that though dude. Don't let the U.S's stigma of them get to you, LSD has a profound psychological effect on you. The after effect has your mind trained to think beyond its limits with more analytical thinking.
Ummm...no.

Look, if you like LSD--fine. But don't try to bullshit your way about this by claiming it expands your mind. Just be honest and say you like it. Bullshit apologetics are neither required nor useful, as there's nothing inherently wrong on any level about taking such substances. I realize that you believe you have to justify your usage to a society (as it were) which has been brainwashed into frowning upon it. Please don't insult us here with such nonsense.

 

 

This is about right

 Let us look then and see, how they manage their concerns- they for whose cause we are to labor, devote ourselves, and grow enthusiastic

 -Max Stirner, The Ego and His Own

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,503
Points 28,705
Moderator

John Ess:
Root, however, merely cut off circulation to his brain for a bit too long.

There must be a kernel of truth in this.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 986
Points 15,895
Conza88 replied on Sat, Oct 3 2009 10:28 AM

Were you high when you started this thread?

Honest question. Stick out tongue

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 150 Contributor
Male
Posts 279
Points 9,175

Dondoolee:

Knight_of_BAAWA:

Democracy for Breakfast:
Its a lot more then that though dude. Don't let the U.S's stigma of them get to you, LSD has a profound psychological effect on you. The after effect has your mind trained to think beyond its limits with more analytical thinking.
Ummm...no.

Look, if you like LSD--fine. But don't try to bullshit your way about this by claiming it expands your mind. Just be honest and say you like it. Bullshit apologetics are neither required nor useful, as there's nothing inherently wrong on any level about taking such substances. I realize that you believe you have to justify your usage to a society (as it were) which has been brainwashed into frowning upon it. Please don't insult us here with such nonsense.

 

 

This is about right

Listen, Its up to you weather you want to do LSD or Smoke Marijuana or not, I never said you should do it. 

Also, I just think its important for people do some research to know what your talking about before they make claims like how addictive the two are. There's sciencifical evidence against those claims such as being addictive, gateway drug, negatively effecting health, ect. Because its usually until people actually do research that they realize all the myths made up by the Statists are bullshit. It's often for those myths that people continue to support The Federal War on Drugs.

 

These are the popular myths.

http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/lsd/lsd_myth1.shtml

http://www.erowid.org/plants/cannabis/cannabis_myth.shtml

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 2,500
Points 40,210
Moderator

See? You just did it again. You tried to justify your like of the drug by spewing factoids about claims which weren't even made here. You don't need to justify yourself! READ THE PREVIOUS SENTENCE AGAIN!

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
Male
Posts 512
Points 9,510
Dondoolee replied on Mon, Oct 19 2009 6:18 PM

There's sciencifical evidence against those claims such as being addictive

I do love scientifical evidence, particulaly when it scienduces things to a scienterrific conclusion.

 Let us look then and see, how they manage their concerns- they for whose cause we are to labor, devote ourselves, and grow enthusiastic

 -Max Stirner, The Ego and His Own

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 100 Contributor
Male
Posts 336
Points 6,185
sirmonty replied on Tue, Oct 20 2009 12:39 AM

Personally, I do believe entheogen substances have the potential ability to "open the mind" or potentially expand the creative insight of the user, but KoB is right, there is no need to use such apologetics.  It is as irritating as the "medical marijuana" argument.  It is absolutely ridiculous that people have to use the medicinal argument.

Start the argument where it starts: I have the right to do what ever the hell I want to my own body, if it kills me slowly, happy for me, f*** you.

  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Male
Posts 13
Points 230
KimberCT replied on Tue, Oct 20 2009 10:21 AM

I'm curious... how does the Mises community feel about the use of nootropics?

Certainly these would qualify as awareness enhancers, but without the negative stigma associated with drugs like LSD.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 100 Contributor
Male
Posts 294
Points 5,005

"Code Fuel" "Poor man's cocaine" "Jolt" you know... caffieine.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 2 of 2 (29 items) < Previous 1 2 | RSS

Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528

Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119

contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises

Mises.org sitemap