The Mises Community
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

New stupid YouTube video

rated by 0 users
This post has 11 Replies | 6 Followers

Top 200 Contributor
Posts 176
Points 3,895
Capital Pumper Posted: Sat, Aug 29 2009 8:25 PM

From the award winning polemicist who brought you who brought you, "Goodbye Bush You War Criminal You" comes the smoking gun of the century.

Guest Starring: FoxMulderXFOxx, the man who revealed that Anarcho-Capitalism is really Nazism!

 

This comedy of the century must be the beginning of Shiva's divine handy work.

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 108
Points 2,310
socialdtk replied on Sat, Aug 29 2009 8:52 PM

So her argument is: I don't like Libertarians because they are mostly white males and or college students that don't attribute their successes and failures to the system.  Instead they believe they are responsible for what happens in their lives and don't look to third parties for mandatory charity.  Also they are stupid and ridiculous and should live on an island or in The Iraq or maybe Somalia.

 

Insanity in individuals is something rare - but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule.
-Friedrich Nietzsche
  • | Post Points: 35
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 79
Points 1,160

We white males are so evil.

 

All kidding aside, one of my good friends is an African American anarcho-capitalist, go figure.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 52
Points 900

But don't you see? Any ideology which is adhered to many by a white college student demographic must inherently be wrong! With such powerful logic, I have nothing left to do but cast off my anarcho-capitalist beliefs (actually, fascism, from the other overpoweringly logical video). Just a few statist chains hanging round my neck, and I'll be free as an eagle! The seas will turn to kool-aid, and beautiful women will swoon on sight.

I remember making a comment on Slashdot, where someone responded that my comment was a "Randian teenage rant." This is what passes as logic for the statists. When confronted by a logic that attacks the entire system in which they have been indoctrinated in for life, their only response is to resort to the ad hominem, attacking the messenger as a juvenile fool who'll quickly grow up and cast off those silly beliefs. I suppose they have never heard of Nock, Walter Block, or any other individual who grew up and maintained anarchism.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 65
Points 1,195
Fluery replied on Sat, Aug 29 2009 9:41 PM

Guilty white male here...Wink

She didn't even offer a real argument.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 237
Points 4,175
garegin replied on Sat, Aug 29 2009 10:00 PM

socialists are mostly white males too, so the argument falls apart

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,465
Points 24,465
Daniel replied on Sat, Aug 29 2009 11:02 PM

Marx: white
Engels: white
French 19th century revolutionaries: white
Emma Gold: white
J.Maynard Keynes: white
Thomas More: white
Robert Owen: white
Henri de Saint Simon: white

edit: fixed links

My favorite online shop: www.cafepress.com/libertyphile Big Smile

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 200 Contributor
Male
Posts 142
Points 2,120
Praetyre replied on Sat, Aug 29 2009 11:37 PM

Daniel:

Marx: white
Engels: white
French 19th century revolutionaries: white
Emma Gold: white
J.Maynard Keynes: white
Thomas More: white
Robert Owen: white
Henri de Saint Simon: white

Emma Goldman, John Maynard Keynes and Thomas More weren't Marxists The first was an anarchist, the second a Keynesian and the third a Utopist.

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,465
Points 24,465
Daniel replied on Sat, Aug 29 2009 11:43 PM

Very good. A++ for thou.

My favorite online shop: www.cafepress.com/libertyphile Big Smile

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 1,059
Points 19,170
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
Lilburne replied on Sat, Aug 29 2009 11:53 PM

Praetyre,

The post Daniel was responding to said that most socialists were white, not most Marxists.  And Emma Goldman and Thomas More were both socialists.  Keynes was not, but he did admire socialism.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 108
Points 2,310
socialdtk replied on Sun, Aug 30 2009 7:55 AM

Zach_the_Lizard:
Just a few statist chains hanging round my neck, and I'll be free as an eagle! The seas will turn to kool-aid, and beautiful women will swoon on sight.

lol

Zach_the_Lizard:
I suppose they have never heard of Nock, Walter Block, or any other individual who grew up and maintained anarchism.

I assume they also believe that objectivism was an ideology spawned through the leaking of Ayn Rand's high school diary and upon reaching the age of 25 she was mortified.

Insanity in individuals is something rare - but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule.
-Friedrich Nietzsche
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,809
Points 27,750
Moderator
MVP

Lilburne:

Praetyre,

The post Daniel was responding to said that most socialists were white, not most Marxists.  And Emma Goldman and Thomas More were both socialists.  Keynes was not, but he did admire socialism.

Pretty sure Goldman was an anarchist.  She might've not been the ideal anarchist, though.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (12 items) | RSS

Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528

Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119

contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises

Mises.org sitemap