The Mises Community
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

How to solve major problems without a strong government?

rated by 0 users
This post has 214 Replies | 15 Followers

Top 75 Contributor
Posts 436
Points 14,155

liberty student:
Even if Ron Paul was a true minarchist, through and through, it wouldn't change how much respect I have for him.

If he is elected president, I wan't be surprised if he too starts acting like a puppet for the bankers. Power corrupts.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 436
Points 14,155

Adam Frost:
By charging the owner for your services in a mutually beneficial trade. This only seems like a problem to you because you are thinking in terms of the current situation, with largely publicly owned streets etc.

Possibly. But is it a good idea that anyone can buy infrastructure, natural resources etc? What if a terrorist bought the water supply of my town and started poisoning it? Nobody could stop him. It would be his water after all. And according to libertarianism, water is not a right.

  • | Post Points: 65
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 7,643
Points 132,750
MVP
SystemAdministrator

alimentarius:
If he is elected president, I wan't be surprised if he too starts acting like a puppet for the bankers. Power corrupts.

Ron Paul is too old to be corrupted.  They will never let him be President.  The President has no real ideas or power.  He is just the #1 salesman for the institution of the state.  He is the guy everyone loves and everyone hates.  The people who wield the real power are the ones who stand behind him, the ones you never see much said about on the news.

If you find something evil that wobbles, push it. - Gary North

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 436
Points 14,155

liberty student:
People can question some areas of libertarian philosophy that I might be weak on

Like child porn and IP?

liberty student:
I haven't met anyone with any better answers to the questions I can't answer.

And you've succeeded in converting anyone? Or do they leave the discussion believing that you're nuts and that their own answers are superior?

liberty student:
That person would have to argue for violence.

 Not necessarily, just coercion. The government steals your dollars before they enter your bank account, so they don't need to use violence. And what if coercion prevents suffering, violence or poverty?

 

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Male
Posts 18
Points 240
Adam Frost replied on Tue, Aug 25 2009 12:31 AM

alimentarius:

Adam Frost:
By charging the owner for your services in a mutually beneficial trade. This only seems like a problem to you because you are thinking in terms of the current situation, with largely publicly owned streets etc.

Possibly. But is it a good idea that anyone can buy infrastructure, natural resources etc? What if a terrorist bought the water supply of my town and started poisoning it? Nobody could stop him. It would be his water after all. And according to libertarianism, water is not a right.

But it would be your water once you bought it, and there most certainly would be a case against him were he to sell water under the assumption it is safe to consume but instead poisoned it.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 75
Points 1,040
Tex2002ans replied on Tue, Aug 25 2009 12:42 AM

alimentarius:
What if a terrorist bought the water supply of my town and started poisoning it?

Then you would get your water other ways besides from that evil water terrorist (plus he would be run out of business quite quickly).  You could always go to the grocery store to buy bottled water, or get those huge 10 gallon jugs of water delivered to your house daily.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 7,643
Points 132,750
MVP
SystemAdministrator

alimentarius:
Like child porn and IP?

I'm strong on IP.  I just don't like talking about child porn, or children in general.  Again it's not that I don't have opinions or thoughts on the matter, but these are areas people get very emotional about, and I hate having to deal with irrationality.

alimentarius:
And you've succeeded in converting anyone?

A fair number.

alimentarius:
Or do they leave the discussion believing that you're nuts and that their own answers are superior?

Irrational people, cannot be reasoned with.  That's not so much a failure on my part, as a set of circumstances which does not tend to victory conditions.

alimentarius:
Not necessarily, just coercion. The government steals your dollars before they enter your bank account, so they don't need to use violence.

The implicit threat of access to my bank account, and my inability to stop them, is based on the fact that they are legally authorized to use violence to support taking my property, but I am not authorized to use force to defend myself.  If you resist the state long enough, the penalty is always death.

alimentarius:
And what if coercion prevents suffering, violence or poverty?

And what if coercion causes suffering, violence and poverty?  It's like trying to fight a fire with gasoline.  It doesn't make any sense.

If there is suffering, private charitable donations always outnumber state aid.  They just aren't cataloged and reported the way that state aid is accounted for.  Think about all of the people everyday who share a sandwich, support their parents, buy a present, share a cab etc.  We are social animals, and maintain our trade networks through mutual aid because it is intrinsic to our nature.

If you find something evil that wobbles, push it. - Gary North

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 436
Points 14,155

liberty student:
Free people can figure out solutions without politicians and bureaucrats.  If they cannot, then they should not even be allowed to vote.  If they can't make a good decision with their own property, how can they make good decisions for the nation?

Voting wiill be meaningless in a society without government?

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 7,643
Points 132,750
MVP
SystemAdministrator

alimentarius:
But is it a good idea that anyone can buy infrastructure, natural resources etc?

Who is better than another?

alimentarius:
What if a terrorist bought the water supply of my town and started poisoning it?

No one would drink it.  So he would have paid good money for poisoned water.

alimentarius:
And according to libertarianism, water is not a right.

Nature is pretty amazing.  Anything necessary for human survival, is not so scarce, that it can be easily monopolized.  For example, water falls from the sky.

If you find something evil that wobbles, push it. - Gary North

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 7,643
Points 132,750
MVP
SystemAdministrator

alimentarius:
Voting wiill be meaningless in a society without government?

Sure. What would people vote on?

My point was, if you can't trust people to plan their own lives, then how can you trust them to choose their politicians?

If you find something evil that wobbles, push it. - Gary North

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,465
Points 24,465
Daniel replied on Tue, Aug 25 2009 12:51 AM

1) You're presupposing that the state is capable of preventing all crime, and that the state is not curruptable.

2) There are plenty of private providers of water already. When was the last time Crystal Geyser poisoned its product?

My favorite online shop: www.cafepress.com/libertyphile Big Smile

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 436
Points 14,155

liberty student:
If the books could be printed in softcover, or downloaded as PDF, students could save a lot of money. 

Actually, the cost of hardback printing hardly exceed the cost of softcover printing. It is mostly the copyrights that make books expensive.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 7,643
Points 132,750
MVP
SystemAdministrator

alimentarius:
It is mostly the copyrights that make books expensive.

HA!  Now you are making my arguments for me!  Big Smile  Now I can sleep.  Nice talking to you today.

If you find something evil that wobbles, push it. - Gary North

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 436
Points 14,155

liberty student:
They will never let him be President.  The President has no real ideas or power.  He is just the #1 salesman for the institution of the state.  He is the guy everyone loves and everyone hates.  The people who wield the real power are the ones who stand behind him, the ones you never see much said about on the news.

I know, Rockefeller, Rotschild, Brzezinski and so on. But if we cannot vote libertarianism to power, how then, without using violence?

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 436
Points 14,155

liberty student:

alimentarius:
And you've succeeded in converting anyone?

A fair number.

Not bad. You've helped one more over the edge the last couple of days.

liberty student:
If you resist the state long enough, the penalty is always death.

 Do you mean that they'll kill you if you resist them long enough?

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 436
Points 14,155

Even if Ron Paul was a true minarchist, through and through, it wouldn't change how much respect I have for him.

But you consider minarchism a violent and deeply immoral ideology, right? Just not quite as the current system.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 436
Points 14,155

liberty student:
Who is better than another?

Experts on environment, infrastructure and city planning?

 

liberty student:
Nature
liberty student:
Nature is pretty amazing.  Anything necessary for human survival, is not so scarce, that it can be easily monopolized.  For example, water falls from the sky.

With  today's environmental and demographical development, it's ineviitable that there will be water crises in the future.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 436
Points 14,155

liberty student:
if you can't trust people to plan their own lives, then how can you trust them to choose their politicians?

I'm using that argument frequently. The standard objection is: "The majority is able to plan their own lives and choose good leaders. A minority is not. The majority secures good leaders for the minority through our political system".

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 436
Points 14,155

Daniel:

1) You're presupposing that the state is capable of preventing all crime, and that the state is not curruptable.

 I've used this arguments as well. Answers I got:

1) We're electing our politicians iin our society. We're not electing  the criminals.

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 436
Points 14,155

Lol. Thanks the same. Btw, did you get my PM?

  • | Post Points: 20
Page 5 of 11 (215 items) « First ... < Previous 3 4 5 6 7 Next > ... Last » | RSS

Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528

Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119

contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises

Mises.org sitemap