The Mises Community
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Age of maturity

rated by 0 users
This post has 13 Replies | 8 Followers

Top 75 Contributor
Posts 436
Points 14,155
alimentarius Posted: Mon, Aug 24 2009 1:30 PM

Libertarians oppose coercion, but I guess we can all agree that children need to be coerced. But untill which age? What should the age of maturity be?

  • | Post Points: 65
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 176
Points 3,895

I don't subscribe to that feudalistic era of 'thinking'.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,465
Points 24,465
Daniel replied on Mon, Aug 24 2009 1:37 PM

No, libertarianism doesn't oppose all coercion. You could use coercion to recover your stolen property or to defend yourself. But to answer your question, this is a gray area. However, how would the state be any better at answering this question?

My favorite online shop: www.cafepress.com/libertyphile Big Smile

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 150 Contributor
Male
Posts 229
Points 4,435
Andrew replied on Mon, Aug 24 2009 2:22 PM

When they are able to logically state that they as a human and individual recognize their "rights", can justify through debate how and why they should be responsible for themselves, know in a pragmatic sense what is right and wrong, and not need paternal supervision of their actions.

As far as I'm concerned that could be anywhere from 13 - 100.

All statutory rape laws when both partners consent should be abolished.

I wonder if some states have paternal laws for the old and elderly.

 

Democracy is nothing more than replacing bullets with ballots

 

If Pro is the opposite of Con. What is the opposite of Progress?

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 436
Points 14,155

So you don't agree that there  should be a minimum age for buying alcohol for instance? Should the grocery stores decide themselves?

  • | Post Points: 65
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,352
Points 23,910
Byzantine replied on Mon, Aug 24 2009 3:24 PM

Age of majority, i.e., the age at which you are answerable for crimes, contractual obligations, consent to sexual relations, etc., is the term you are looking for.  Probably somewhere between age 14 and 16.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,247
Points 65,050
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
SystemAdministrator

So you don't agree that there should be a minimum age for buying alcohol for instance? Should the grocery stores decide themselves?

No, I don't.

To darkness I condemn you...

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 4,120
Points 66,185
Moderator

the age when you are able to afford to drink is probably important to this story somehow....

Where there is no property there is no justice; a proposition as certain as any demonstration in Euclid

Fools! not to see that what they madly desire would be a calamity to them as no hands but their own could bring

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,465
Points 24,465
Daniel replied on Mon, Aug 24 2009 3:49 PM

alimentarius:

So you don't agree that there  should be a minimum age for buying alcohol for instance? Should the grocery stores decide themselves?

Answer my question first, then I'l answer your question.

My favorite online shop: www.cafepress.com/libertyphile Big Smile

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 79
Points 1,455
Solarist replied on Mon, Aug 24 2009 3:53 PM

alimentarius:
So you don't agree that there  should be a minimum age for buying alcohol for instance? Should the grocery stores decide themselves?

 

I think you will find that the market will decide on an drinking age.  I doubt a free society would support Walmart pushing vodka on 10 year olds.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 100 Contributor
Posts 295
Points 5,880

Solarist:

alimentarius:
So you don't agree that there  should be a minimum age for buying alcohol for instance? Should the grocery stores decide themselves?

 

I think you will find that the market will decide on an drinking age.  I doubt a free society would support Walmart pushing vodka on 10 year olds.

The grocery storesshould decide for themselves. Or even better. Regulation companies that certify grocery stores could, as part of their "certification", regulate the minimum age.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 396
Points 4,695

Andrew:

When they are able to logically state that they as a human and individual recognize their "rights", can justify through debate how and why they should be responsible for themselves, know in a pragmatic sense what is right and wrong, and not need paternal supervision of their actions.

Many people would fail that to death by old age.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,751
Points 149,610

A two-fold pretext to any talk of children:

1. Children are not the property of the state.

2. They aren't the property of their parents either.

 

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 862
Points 15,105

Why should there be an 'age of maturity'?

'My house, my rules' seems to take care of the coercion problem nicely.

The whole premise of the OP's argument seems to suggest that the parents have some sort of social/legal obligation to provide a living to their children up to some arbitrary, non-consentingly defined age. Next thing you know they (or 'society') will be obligated to provide them with 'rights' like education and health care and parents who violate these 'rights' will be dealt with by the full force of the Law.

Yup, either the parents or the children get coerced as long as one has a claim on the other by the mere fact of parentage.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (14 items) | RSS

Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528

Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119

contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises

Mises.org sitemap