The Mises Community
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

The rich cannot be rich without the poor

rated by 0 users
This post has 183 Replies | 20 Followers

Not Ranked
Posts 27
Points 675
yoshimura Posted: Sat, Aug 15 2009 10:20 PM

I hear a lot of variations on this…

"The system of money creates seperational competition in which a large amount of people need to fail in order for a few to succeed."

"the rich cannot be rich without the poor. ALL WEALTH is obtained through the sweat and sometimes blood of the poor."

Is this true? Any refutations or clarifications?

 

Thanks for the help

  • | Post Points: 155
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 2,445
Points 39,290
Moderator

It's not true. It's the emotive plea of those who hate everyone who has a penny more than they do.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 574
Points 9,290
Moderator
Natalie replied on Sat, Aug 15 2009 10:48 PM

Statistically top 20% highest earners in US work more hours than lowest 20%

If I hear not allowed much oftener; said Sam, I'm going to get angry.

J.R.R.Tolkien, The Lord of the Rings

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 110
Points 3,220
McDuffie replied on Sat, Aug 15 2009 11:32 PM

Natalie:

Statistically top 20% highest earners in US work more hours than lowest 20%

That's cuz they're greedySuper Angry

Read my Nolan Chart column "Me & My Big Mouth"

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 2,569
Points 45,445
Stranger replied on Sun, Aug 16 2009 12:00 AM

It's partially true. It's also true that the poor could not be poor without the rich. They would be quite dead.

A division of labor society is one where everyone's livelihood depends on everyone else's.

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 150 Contributor
Male
Posts 194
Points 2,590
Wanderer replied on Sun, Aug 16 2009 12:17 AM

If the poor don't like the rich, they don't hafta do business with them, thus cutting them off from their money/labor.

Periodically the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots.

Thomas Jefferson

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,751
Points 149,610

I think stranger's comment is the closest to the truth so far. One can't make a hard either/or statement in either direction due to the symbiotic or mutually dependant relationships that occur. The fact of the matter is that people are economically interdependant to a significant extent, perhaps barring primitivism (and even in primitivist scenarios, there is an unavoidable degree of interaction; hardly anyone is "purely self-sufficient" as an individual).

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 92
Points 2,020
Felipe replied on Sun, Aug 16 2009 12:48 AM

yoshimura:

I hear a lot of variations on this…

"The system of money creates seperational competition in which a large amount of people need to fail in order for a few to succeed."

"the rich cannot be rich without the poor. ALL WEALTH is obtained through the sweat and sometimes blood of the poor."

I remember another "in the free market people compete and in a competition someone has to win"

Friedman once said that life is not a zero sum game (a person wins from the loss of another) instead in a free market both men can benefit achieving their separate interests.

Then I remember reading about how the exchange of goods in a free market increases the value of such goods and therefore enables the creation of wealth trough the consumer's choice.

 

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 9
Points 120

Wealth is created, not "obtained."

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 141
Points 1,895
Stolz25 replied on Sun, Aug 16 2009 2:14 AM

yoshimura:
"the rich cannot be rich without the poor. ALL WEALTH is obtained through the sweat and sometimes blood of the poor."

See, my feeling is if there weren't any women none of us would be here.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 4,114
Points 66,145
Moderator

there will always be a bottom 50%, whether your metric is nominal wealth, intelligence, strength, joke telling ability, family size, number of friends,...ad_infinitum

whatever.

 

Where there is no property there is no justice; a proposition as certain as any demonstration in Euclid

Fools! not to see that what they madly desire would be a calamity to them as no hands but their own could bring

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 38
Points 1,090

Stranger:

It's partially true. It's also true that the poor could not be poor without the rich. They would be quite dead.

A division of labor society is one where everyone's livelihood depends on everyone else's.

Alternative business management will emerge and has emerged throughout history.

 

The "rich" expropriate the surplus value of the "poor's" labor.

 

Natalie:

Statistically top 20% highest earners in US work more hours than lowest 20%

 

Define "work". Statistically,  thousands of American workers die each year. How many capitalists have died in work related incidents?

 

http://www.industryweek.com/articles/workplace_fatalities_in_the_u-s-_by_the_numbers_14994.aspx

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 501
Points 7,375
Moderator
ladyattis replied on Sun, Aug 16 2009 4:36 PM

Wolves of Paris:
The "rich" expropriate the surplus value of the "poor's" labor.

 

Please stop using the fallacious Labor Theory of Value before you make me die from laughter.

"The power of liberty going forward is in decentralization.  Not in leaders, but in decentralized activism.  In a market process." -- liberty student

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 38
Points 1,090

ladyattis:

Wolves of Paris:
The "rich" expropriate the surplus value of the "poor's" labor.

 

Please stop using the fallacious Labor Theory of Value before you make me die from laughter.

If the rich didn't expropriate the surplus value of the worker's labor and the workers were actually rewarded for the product they produced than the owner of the means of production wouldn't have profit.

  • | Post Points: 50
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,247
Points 65,050
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
SystemAdministrator

And the rivers would flow with honey and the unicorns would fly above the rainbows...

Really.

To darkness I condemn you...

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 501
Points 7,375
Moderator
ladyattis replied on Sun, Aug 16 2009 4:41 PM

Profit cannot be consumed in whole. I suggest you take a listen to Salerno's lecture on the nature of production before going any further in discussing this.

"The power of liberty going forward is in decentralization.  Not in leaders, but in decentralized activism.  In a market process." -- liberty student

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 38
Points 1,090

ladyattis:

Profit cannot be consumed in whole. I suggest you take a listen to Salerno's lecture on the nature of production before going any further in discussing this.

 

How is that relevant to process in which said profit is collected?

 

Have a link?

 

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 501
Points 7,375
Moderator
ladyattis replied on Sun, Aug 16 2009 4:57 PM

Wolves of Paris:

ladyattis:

Profit cannot be consumed in whole. I suggest you take a listen to Salerno's lecture on the nature of production before going any further in discussing this.

 

How is that relevant to process in which said profit is collected?

 

Have a link?

 

 

I think this is the link. and it's relevance is that profit isn't stolen from the workers as they are paid for it via wage in exchange of ownership in said production.

 

"The power of liberty going forward is in decentralization.  Not in leaders, but in decentralized activism.  In a market process." -- liberty student

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 38
Points 1,090

ladyattis:

Wolves of Paris:

ladyattis:

Profit cannot be consumed in whole. I suggest you take a listen to Salerno's lecture on the nature of production before going any further in discussing this.

 

How is that relevant to process in which said profit is collected?

 

Have a link?

 

 

I think this is the link. and it's relevance is that profit isn't stolen from the workers as they are paid for it via wage in exchange of ownership in said production.

 

 

Thank you.

I never said that the profit was stolen nor did I say they were not rewarded at all.

 

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 501
Points 7,375
Moderator
ladyattis replied on Sun, Aug 16 2009 5:01 PM

They are rewarded with the wage.

"The power of liberty going forward is in decentralization.  Not in leaders, but in decentralized activism.  In a market process." -- liberty student

  • | Post Points: 20
Page 1 of 10 (184 items) 1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last » | RSS

Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528

Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119

contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises

Mises.org sitemap