Who knows climate science? The Mises Blog!

The Road Not Taken II: Austrians strive for a self-comforting irrelevancy on climate change, the greatest commons problem / rent-seeking game of our age

TT`s Lost in Tokyo — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:14:23 GMT

Op-ed by nuclear physicist on climate change: questions for "skeptics"

TT`s Lost in Tokyo — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 07:50:27 GMT

John P. Holdren , an MIT and Stanford -trained nuclear physicist who is professor at Harvard's Kennedy

Nick Kristof on politics: why we conclude that I'm right, and you're evil

TT's Samurai Stumblings — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:05:50 GMT

Here's a very interesting piece by Kristof at the New York Times about the reactions of Obama and

"Heroic" contrarians, proven wrong on AGW, make another slick cry for relevance at Bali

TheTokyoTominator — Sun, 23 Dec 2007 08:47:15 GMT

On the main blog, Sean Corrigan posts the latest missive of what he considers the brave dissenting voices

re: Who knows climate science? The Mises Blog!

TokyoTom — Sat, 15 Dec 2007 06:56:21 GMT

Many thanks, Jeff. I have responded to you directly by email.

re: Who knows climate science? The Mises Blog!

jtucker — Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:53:47 GMT

Tom, the first time I read this post, I had a hard time seeing your point through the heavy fog of sarcasm. Writers of think that sarcasm makes their writing more biting in some way, but it really doesn't work. I don't know if it is the venue of the web or if it is a general principle. In case case, it is bad form if your goal is to be understood.