Apropos Austrian Aphorisms

the T(hesaurus)-Rex of blogs chomping on malapropos market malapropisms

My Mom is as Qualified as Sarah Palin to be Vice President

She’s Even as Qualified as Barack Obama and John McCain to be President

Allow me to indulge in a child’s old adage: My mom is as qualified as your mom to be vice president. Upon such a claim many will naturally ask what my mother’s qualifications are. Certainly they should be extensive given the media scrutiny to Sarah Palin’s underwhelming qualifications. But my mom’s are not much. She’s simply over the age of 35, a naturally-born citizen, and has resided in the United States for the past 14 years. Like many of her peers, she’s as qualified as the next person, according to the U.S. Constitution.

It’s true, if you look, that the only “qualifications” to being vice president, even president, are the ones I listed for my mother. That’s not the impression one would get from those who criticize Sarah Palin and even Barack Obama as lacking in “experience.” Those people never define what the qualifications and experience are. Allow me to bolster my mother’s defense.

My mom is a mother of three (lovely, if I say so myself) children. She’s a college graduate, one who even went to school while tending to her children. She graduated with a degree to teach. Simply put, my mother can read, write, and listen.

These three traits encompass the delineated powers of the vice presidency and presidency in the U.S. Constitution. Namely, to be the head of the Senate, for the former, and to make treaties, appoint judges, and tell the Army and Navy what to do. When you consider that a vice president and president get most of their policy information from their cabinet and peers, my mother could surely do all of these functions with ease.

The cynic of course will say this is all too simple. The office of the vice president, and the president for that matter, is much more complex than the simple trifles of domestic life. This is where Palin receives her criticism. Not even her “town of 9,000” was big enough to provide her with experience to stand behind the president. This criticism is apt and correct.

Yet only in a time when the U.S. Constitution no longer applies is the vice presidency and presidency complex. A look at what is asked of both offices clearly explains this present-day complexity over the past-day simplicity. The president and vice president today are held to explain how they will create jobs. They’re asked about their energy, fiscal, foreign, environment, and tax policies, and so on and so forth through an extensive list nowhere mentioned in the U.S. Constitution.

My mom, of course, has never dealt with these ugly political manners. She’s never “created” any jobs. She’s always gone out and achieved her own. Her energy policy consists of the “simple” idea of not consuming more than she can pay for. She doesn’t counterfeit money as the Federal Reserve does, always paying her bills. She doesn’t go around to her neighbors destroying their land to show them how to live freely. She properly disposes of her trash, doesn’t steal other people’s money, and so on and so forth.

My mom, of course, is a woman of pride and would never act as such a brute. We wouldn’t expect any decent human being to act as such. Yet many people see these actions as O.K. and all too well to do because the U.S. Constitution no longer applies. It’s now expected that the vice president and president make these actions a part of their so-called policy.

Frederic Bastiat long ago clarified the proper role of the Law and, by extension, the government. The law is “the collective organization of the individual right to self defense”—to defend person, liberty, and property. That is, anything we’d expect an individual not to do, a government should also not do, such as oppress and plunder.

Only when the law is confined to its proper place will the cries over “experience” and “readiness” for any form of presidency cease. As Bastiat said, “if law were nothing more than the organized combination of the individual's right to self defense; if law were the obstacle, the check, the punisher of all oppression and plunder — is it likely that we citizens would then argue much about the extent of the franchise?”

Truly, if the U.S. Constitution were cared for, in all of its check on executive power, my mom, among many others, would certainly be qualified as the next vice president or president as any of the existing candidates.

Published Sat, Sep 6 2008 10:24 AM by thedo