http://mises.org/Community/blogs/scottyokim/archive/2008/02/02/social-graphs-and-transparency-and-rwanda.aspxContinuing my thoughts about social graphs, I thought that I would list some assumptions that (the social graph of) my brain currently makes on behalf of social graphs. If they are written down they can at least be refuted. So I currently assume thatenCommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)http://mises.org/Community/blogs/scottyokim/archive/2008/02/02/social-graphs-and-transparency-and-rwanda.aspx#38050Tue, 17 Jun 2008 06:31:03 GMT944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:38050Srini Srinivasan<p>I came across your post when searching for Personal Graph. &nbsp;The ties that bind individuals will overcome the all baggage of misperception. At the back of our minds when we built our personal graph site(facetplay) this is what we thought would be the ideal end goal. If you have the chance check it out.</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://mises.org/Community/aggbug.aspx?PostID=38050" width="1" height="1">http://mises.org/Community/blogs/scottyokim/archive/2008/02/02/social-graphs-and-transparency-and-rwanda.aspx#16341Mon, 04 Feb 2008 03:39:56 GMT944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:16341pairunoyd<p>I'd like to see barriers between business and individuals lowered. For example, there are multiple millions on the internet. Why can't businesses solicit for service A or good A and then sift submissions? Then continue. They can do business on a per transaction basis. If a particular transaction is especially favorable, they can give that service provider a special tag or what have you.</p> <p>Example: Why spend millions on advertising campaigns when so much could be culled from the net masses? Even if it's not perfectly packaged it can contribute to the final product. And what about issues of efficiency? Are there not problems that can be valuably addressed by the masses?</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://mises.org/Community/aggbug.aspx?PostID=16341" width="1" height="1">