<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://mises.org/Community/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Radical Idealism : statism, environmentalism</title><link>http://mises.org/Community/blogs/radicalidealism/archive/tags/statism/environmentalism/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: statism, environmentalism</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Do compact fluorescent lights really save energy?</title><link>http://mises.org/Community/blogs/radicalidealism/archive/2008/01/17/do-compact-fluorescent-lights-really-save-energy.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:37:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:11491</guid><dc:creator>HeroicLife</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://mises.org/Community/blogs/radicalidealism/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=11491</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://mises.org/Community/blogs/radicalidealism/commentapi.aspx?PostID=11491</wfw:comment><comments>http://mises.org/Community/blogs/radicalidealism/archive/2008/01/17/do-compact-fluorescent-lights-really-save-energy.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Earlier this month, &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Independence_and_Security_Act_of_2007#Incandescent_lights"&gt;Congress passed a law&lt;/a&gt; which will essentially force the public to switch to compact fluorescent lights. (CFLs)&amp;nbsp; Environmentalists and &lt;a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110011070"&gt;light bulb makers&lt;/a&gt; joined forces to boost power and profits, and perhaps &lt;a href="http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/search-results.html?search=Compact+fluorescent&amp;amp;imageField2.x=19&amp;amp;imageField2.y=12"&gt;sue&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/search-results.html?search=Compact+fluorescent&amp;amp;imageField2.x=19&amp;amp;imageField2.y=12"&gt; the competition out of existence&lt;/a&gt;.Some people object to the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compact_fluorescent_lamp#Design_issues"&gt;narrow light spectrum&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compact_fluorescent_lamp#Cleanup_of_broken_bulbs"&gt;toxic&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compact_fluorescent_lamp#Mercury_emissions"&gt;Mercury content&lt;/a&gt;
of CFL lights, but I don’t&amp;nbsp;care about those things.&amp;nbsp; I have replaced
most of the incandescent lights in my apartment, and plan to eventually
replace the rest.&amp;nbsp; What I question is not the usefulness of CFLs, but
the premise that switching to them will “save energy.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As with most goods and services, the price of a utility influences
the quantity I am willing to pay for.&amp;nbsp; When the price of gas doubles, I
reconsider taking road trips, and try to be more efficient with my
driving.&amp;nbsp; Likewise, when the price of electricity falls, I am more
liberal with my power consumption.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Compact fluorescent lights lower
the cost of lightning in two ways: they use one quarter of the energy,
and they &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compact_fluorescent_lamp#Lifespan"&gt;last ten times as long&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; These innovations encourage greater usage of lighting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;I have a spiffy IKEA lamp behind my couch, but
because I don’t have a light in my ceiling fan, it needs to be extra
bright.&amp;nbsp; Furthermore, the geometry of my living room makes it annoying
to walk behind the couch every day to turn it on.&amp;nbsp; By switching to a
compact fluorescent light, I was able to get a 100 watt equivalent
light in a 60 watt socket, and thanks to its efficiency and long life,
I just leave the light permanently on.&amp;nbsp; I am enjoying greater
convenience, but I don’t know if I am saving any energy.&lt;/p&gt;
If the average consumer’s monthly lightning budget is fixed, they
might compensate for the higher efficiency and lifespan of CFLs by
increasing their lightning usage to completely offset any energy
reduction.&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;This would be especially true if consumers are
forced to switch to CFLs by legislators rather than a desire to save
energy costs.&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;Much as auto safety regulations can lead to &lt;a href="http://oneminute.rationalmind.net/mandatory-seatbelt-laws/"&gt;reckless behavior&lt;/a&gt;, forcing consumers to switch to more efficient lights might actually increase their energy usage.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;address&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.rationalmind.net/2008/01/14/do-compact-fluorescent-lights-really-save-energy/"&gt;(Crossposted&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/address&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://mises.org/Community/aggbug.aspx?PostID=11491" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://mises.org/Community/blogs/radicalidealism/archive/tags/environmentalism/default.aspx">environmentalism</category><category domain="http://mises.org/Community/blogs/radicalidealism/archive/tags/statism/default.aspx">statism</category></item></channel></rss>