<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://mises.org/Community/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>IrishOutlaw : nationalism, illegal</title><link>http://mises.org/Community/blogs/irishoutlaw/archive/tags/nationalism/illegal/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: nationalism, illegal</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Immigration Smokescreen</title><link>http://mises.org/Community/blogs/irishoutlaw/archive/2007/11/17/immigration-smokescreen.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 20:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:3689</guid><dc:creator>IrishOutlaw</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://mises.org/Community/blogs/irishoutlaw/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=3689</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://mises.org/Community/blogs/irishoutlaw/commentapi.aspx?PostID=3689</wfw:comment><comments>http://mises.org/Community/blogs/irishoutlaw/archive/2007/11/17/immigration-smokescreen.aspx#comments</comments><description>

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;u&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:14pt;"&gt;First Thoughts&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;First, let me say that when I say &amp;quot;illegal
immigration&amp;quot; it is just to differentiate the topic, not because I think
any immigration is illegal or in any way different from any other immigration.
My personal view (from an anarchist’s perspective) is that people can&amp;#39;t be
illegal. Every person born has the same natural rights and liberties and no
government borders can change that. One of my favorite anarchists was Thomas
Jefferson (people think I am crazy for calling him an anarchist), but something
he wrote applies to this thought. &amp;quot;We hold these truths to be
self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their
Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and
the pursuit of Happiness.&amp;quot; Those rights are for everyone and they don&amp;#39;t
come from a government, we are born with them. I think that applies to
everyone, everywhere. Doesn&amp;#39;t matter where they are born. The reason the
government raises and issue with illegals has nothing to do with them taking
jobs, or using welfare, or any of the stuff they talk about illegals being a
problem for. The money for those programs doesn&amp;#39;t come out of the governments’
pocket, so why would they care about it. The only problem the government has
with illegals is that they don&amp;#39;t have the power to tax people they don&amp;#39;t know
about. That’s it. PEOPLE that have a problem with illegal immigrants are very
upset and vocal about the problems they perceive them causing, but if you notice,
the government hasn&amp;#39;t really done anything to address their concerns, except
when it will get them votes. Politicians that still feel some obligation to US
citizens have tried to do things to address it, but it doesn&amp;#39;t gain much
traction. Partly because some of the politicians realize that, despite the cost
associated with &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration, a simple economic principle is
in play. People are capital. They represent a real unit of capital. It is
ALWAYS good for a country to get more people into it. They stimulate the
economy, even if they aren&amp;#39;t paying taxes. The not paying taxes part is
probably the ONLY part the government is really concerned about. I don’t buy
the, “They could be terrorists” argument.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;u&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:14pt;"&gt;Beat Down&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;I have to point out that government has a monopoly that they
force on the people. They have a monopoly over a bunch of things, but the
particulars related to immigration have to do with taxation, control of land,
and the use of force to require compliance. It is in their best interest (not
the interest of the people) to define an area of land as theirs and theirs
alone. The idea that we have private property in this country is really a
misnomer. The government can force anyone to comply with anything they want,
even though a person owns a piece of paper that says the land belongs to them.
They charge a yearly rent for that land in the form of taxes. They make rules
about what you can and can&amp;#39;t do with that land. And if the mood strikes them
and they think they can do something better with that land than the owner, they
can and do take it for themselves. So what does that have to do with illegal
immigration? The main reason for borders is to show the world where their
sphere of influence lies. If they fail to enforce those borders, at least to
make a showing (no matter how half assed), than they are saying we don&amp;#39;t really
care about this area or our influence over it. The reality than is that they
care less about who comes in those borders than who goes out those borders. I
mean, yes they are going to be opposed to other governments trying to move in
to that area and trying to assert force on the people inside them, but as far
as people crossing them, it is mostly in their best interest to have more
people to be able to exert that force over.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;u&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:14pt;"&gt;We the People?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;But, as you know some people inside those borders are
opposed to other people coming over them. I would say they have some legitimate
concerns based on their perceptions of what is going on. They know that the
government is going to force them to give up money to pay for stuff. They know
that people that come over those borders without paperwork that makes they
share in being forced to pay for stuff are getting a free ride for any of those
things they are forced to pay for and the newcomers aren&amp;#39;t. It pisses people
off, but they are pissed at the wrong parties in my opinion. I would personally
be pissed at the people who are exerting the force and are REALLY stealing from
the people, which is the government. If there were no illegal immigrants, there
would still be welfare programs. If there were no illegal immigrants, hospitals
would still have to see people that won&amp;#39;t pay for the services, because by law
they still have to treat people regardless of ability to pay. The illegal
immigrants really are doing jobs people don&amp;#39;t want to do, along with some jobs
that people probably would want to do, but either way, first come first serve.
Ask the onion farms in south Texas about the jobs that Americans won&amp;#39;t do.
Because of the rhetoric concerning illegal immigration, lots of people that
usually work the fields didn&amp;#39;t show up to work this last harvest. And it wasn&amp;#39;t
just in south Texas fields either; it was all across the US. Even the ones that
have come to do the work legally didn&amp;#39;t come this year. There were
advertisements looking for workers, paying in some places $20 an hour to do the
work. But the reality is that the work sucks. 12 to 14 hours a day, hunched
over in the beating down sun, usually 7 days a week. Most Americans don&amp;#39;t want
to do that, for any amount of money. So I don&amp;#39;t buy the &amp;quot;taking jobs
Americans would do&amp;quot; argument at all. The social programs that are being
taken advantage of will exist regardless of who is using them. So the argument
goes back to what the governments argument is, they aren&amp;#39;t paying taxes. On
that point I can only say, good for them. No one should pay their taxes.
Anything that is getting taken out of your check is theft, plain and simple.
Any other taxes we pay, illegal immigrants pay the same taxes. Any illegal immigrants
that are using phony social security numbers are also paying income taxes, and
that is free money for the government, because no one will ever try to claim a
return on it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;u&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:14pt;"&gt;Freedom of Association&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;I think there is also a constitutional issue involved with
illegal immigration, even though I don&amp;#39;t hold much for the constitution itself
(which is a different topic for a different time). The first amendment says in
part, &amp;quot;the right of the people peaceably to assemble&amp;quot;. If you think,
like I do, that &amp;quot;the people&amp;quot; applies to all people (that everyone is
born with equal rights), than stopping people from assembling anywhere is
wrong. If you believe that the constitution only applies to US citizens, it is
still an abridgment of my rights if you want to keep me from assembling with
illegal immigrants by keeping them out of the country. But really it is all
probably a moot point.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;u&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:14pt;"&gt;Nationalism&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;I think nationalism is the same as racism. To me this is the
reason, even if people don&amp;#39;t realize the reason behind it, that some people see
the anti-illegal movement as closet racism. It is about feeling that one group
has more rights or a better station in life, merely by accident of birth. With
racists it is by being born a certain race, with nationalists it is being born
in a certain country. Everyone is free to feel however they want and to
associate with whoever they want. But excluding people for whatever reason cuts
a percentage out of your possibilities. Instead of looking for the things we
think are wrong with illegal immigration, we should look at what is in it for
us. If the government is doing something that is unfair to us, instead of
saying the immigrants are taking advantage, we should place the blame on the
ones who are forcing us to participate. If social programs and taxation are
being taken advantage off, we should cut them off, no matter who is doing the
taking advantage of. Let us give our money to programs that will spend it how
we want, or lets us keep our money, either way. We shouldn&amp;#39;t be forced to participate
in things we think are scams. We shouldn&amp;#39;t be forced to associate or not
associate with anyone.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;u&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:14pt;"&gt;Blame Game&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;We do have a problem in this country and I think illegal
immigration makes it glaringly apparent. But it doesn&amp;#39;t have to do with the
people, but with the government abuses of all of us. We need to quit letting
the government shift the blame, especially when experience tells us that they
have no real plans to do anything about it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;I don&amp;#39;t think people are ever illegal. I would never tell a man
he can&amp;#39;t cross an imaginary line in the sand to feed his family or make a
better life. There are some real issues that should be dealt with that the
immigration problem points out though. I could also probably go on for a couple
of more pages on private property rights and the difference between private
property and &amp;quot;public&amp;quot; property, but I will let it drop for now.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://nonamegroup.wikidot.com/"&gt;The No Name Group Project&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://mises.org/Community/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3689" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://mises.org/Community/blogs/irishoutlaw/archive/tags/IrishOutlaw/default.aspx">IrishOutlaw</category><category domain="http://mises.org/Community/blogs/irishoutlaw/archive/tags/racism/default.aspx">racism</category><category domain="http://mises.org/Community/blogs/irishoutlaw/archive/tags/immigration/default.aspx">immigration</category><category domain="http://mises.org/Community/blogs/irishoutlaw/archive/tags/nationalism/default.aspx">nationalism</category><category domain="http://mises.org/Community/blogs/irishoutlaw/archive/tags/illegal/default.aspx">illegal</category><category domain="http://mises.org/Community/blogs/irishoutlaw/archive/tags/anarchy/default.aspx">anarchy</category></item></channel></rss>