<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://mises.org/Community/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>On Subjective Valuation and Intrinsic Value</title><link>http://mises.org/Community/blogs/donny/archive/2008/08/10/on-subjective-valuation-and-intrinsic-value.aspx</link><description>Some more on this never-ending debate... In ascribing value to certain things, we acknowledge that they matter to us -- they have weight in our calculations about what we should do. But it seems to me that there are two (not mutually exclusive) ways in</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>re: On Subjective Valuation and Intrinsic Value</title><link>http://mises.org/Community/blogs/donny/archive/2008/08/10/on-subjective-valuation-and-intrinsic-value.aspx#94842</link><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 05:54:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:94842</guid><dc:creator>Felipe</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Good analysis&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://mises.org/Community/aggbug.aspx?PostID=94842" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>