<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://mises.org/Community/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Roderick Long on Property</title><link>http://mises.org/Community/blogs/donny/archive/2008/07/31/roderick-long-on-property.aspx</link><description>I was reading Roderick Long&amp;#39;s article, &amp;quot; Land-Locked: A Critique of Carson on Property Rights ,&amp;quot; and came across an argument that left me somewhat skeptical. I&amp;#39;ve recently become convinced that appropriation needs to be justified on</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator></channel></rss>