A Violation of the Rights of the Parent

re: A Violation of the Rights of the Parent

Magnus frater — Wed, 12 Dec 2007 04:06:33 GMT

Am I correct in assuming community, state, and national borders are closed by federal mandate to those wishing to move to a more 'hospitable' forced-immunization- educational-system? If so then yes, their rights have been snatched from their unwitting hands.

I wasn't aware this discussion was on tax law and antiquated truancy mandates, so I won't even respond to that. Regarding IMMUNIZATION IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS, a publicly-elected school board has the right to fight a contagion in any way possible, just as children with contagious diseases are asked to stay home-- would you have a congested classroom populated with Chicken Pox sufferers? Fighting infectious diseases is merely a form of security put in place to protect children, the same as security detectors in modern high schools and the front desk officer who watches for skippers.

Other options were available for the parents that had no plans to accept a free inoculation to protect their children's health. For example, NOT signing a document giving over all of their children's health issues to a school nurse.

You cannot cry foul when your own signature is on the document.

Furthermore, it has become apparent that the State is more competent at raising children than modern adults, so why struggle against a move so obviously positive in motive?

re: A Violation of the Rights of the Parent

dget — Wed, 12 Dec 2007 03:29:20 GMT

You're point fails to consider that many parents cannot simultaneously afford to pay for their child to go to public schools through taxation and pay for an alternative method schooling, such as the examples you mentioned. Further, the mere fact that children are required to be educated defies the rights of the parent. Ultimately your argument fails for these reasons.

re: A Violation of the Rights of the Parent

Magnus frater — Wed, 12 Dec 2007 02:54:41 GMT

Stripping the rights of the parent? Such assumes that enrollment in a public school is a federal law-- when in fact, only education is. Private schools with laxer immunization requirements are available, or home schooling where the parent has complete control. By enrolling in a public school, AND signing a slip allowing the school nurse control over health issues, the parent is in effect allowing the State control over the child from 8am-3pm.

Put simply, the parent is stripping THEMSELVES of control, and therefore any decision by a popularly elected school board is accepted ab initio.

Personally, in matters of contagions, I see no reason for a close-quarters educational system not to require immunizations to control infection.

re: A Violation of the Rights of the Parent

Ronorama — Thu, 15 Nov 2007 18:41:22 GMT

Wow. Utterly amazing.

atplaysx » Blog Archive » A Violation of the Rights of the Parent

atplaysx » Blog Archive » A Violation of the Rights of the Parent — Thu, 15 Nov 2007 04:38:15 GMT

Pingback from atplaysx » Blog Archive » A Violation of the Rights of the Parent