<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://mises.org/Community/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Love of Liberty : taxation</title><link>http://mises.org/Community/blogs/chrisr/archive/tags/taxation/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: taxation</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>A Call for Lower Taxes &amp; Higher Taxes</title><link>http://mises.org/Community/blogs/chrisr/archive/2008/10/07/a-call-for-lower-taxes-amp-higher-taxes.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 05:40:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:56606</guid><dc:creator>ChrisR</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://mises.org/Community/blogs/chrisr/archive/2008/10/07/a-call-for-lower-taxes-amp-higher-taxes.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Larry Kudlow put together some debate tips for John McCain.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After reading the recommendations, I noticed a significant contradiction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mr. Kudlow &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZTZiZTUxYjdjMDZiNzU1MjY1N2VlYjBjNjE1OTlhODA="&gt;states&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&amp;quot;...McCain needs to stress that tax hikes of any kind would be a
total disaster during this economic emergency, and that letting folks
keep more of what they earn is a recovery prescription. He needs to
emphasize the need for across-the-board tax cuts for individuals and
businesses. Lower marginal tax rates will reward work, investment, and
risk-taking. They also will put money in people&amp;rsquo;s pockets as they keep
more of what they earn.&amp;quot;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sounds pretty good....People would have to forget about the $700 billion bailout that just passed....but taking that statement at face value, so far so good.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But then the contradiction:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&amp;quot;McCain also should state that the Federal Reserve needs to keep
expanding the money supply.&amp;quot; &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ron Paul has repeatedly pointed out that inflation is a &lt;i&gt;tax!&lt;/i&gt; In fact, Fed Chairman Bernanke even agreed with Ron Paul &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFVHlMulTPs"&gt;in this video&lt;/a&gt;, saying &lt;i&gt;&amp;quot;Congressman, I couldn&amp;#39;t agree with you more that inflation is a tax.&amp;quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So Mr. Kudlow is calling for lower taxes *and* higher taxes at the same time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://mises.org/Community/aggbug.aspx?PostID=56606" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://mises.org/Community/blogs/chrisr/archive/tags/taxation/default.aspx">taxation</category></item><item><title>Lower Oil is Not a "Tax Cut"</title><link>http://mises.org/Community/blogs/chrisr/archive/2008/08/12/lower-oil-is-not-a-quot-tax-cut-quot.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:47:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:46167</guid><dc:creator>ChrisR</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;The fact that the price of oil has dropped considerably does not constitute any kind of &amp;quot;tax cut.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When the price of oil increases once again, are we supposed to call it a tax &lt;i&gt;increase&lt;/i&gt;? How did the price of oil get singled out for such a distinction? If the prices of wheat, lumber, or cotton decrease, should we be calling them &amp;quot;tax cuts&amp;quot; as well?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since when did market prices become bundled with taxation?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The language seems very sloppy to me, especially since every gallon of gas that we buy contains a &lt;i&gt;real tax&lt;/i&gt; attached to it. I recently read that the gas tax in California is &lt;a href="http://www.californiagasprices.com/tax_info.aspx"&gt;62 cents&lt;/a&gt; out of every gallon. Isn&amp;#39;t it ridiculous to call the lower price of oil a &amp;quot;tax cut,&amp;quot; while actual taxes remain untouched?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let&amp;#39;s say the 62 cent tax is reduced by 10, 50, or even 100%.....&lt;i&gt;Then&lt;/i&gt; you would have a real tax cut.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://mises.org/Community/aggbug.aspx?PostID=46167" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://mises.org/Community/blogs/chrisr/archive/tags/oil/default.aspx">oil</category><category domain="http://mises.org/Community/blogs/chrisr/archive/tags/taxation/default.aspx">taxation</category></item></channel></rss>