<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://mises.org/Community/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Avoiding The Argument From History and Normality </title><link>http://mises.org/Community/blogs/brainpolice/archive/2008/10/09/avoiding-the-argument-from-history-and-normality.aspx</link><description>Often times in political debates, market anarchists may find themselves pressured to produce historical examples of stateless market-based societies. Typically, the market anarchist responds to this by refering to particular periods of medieval iceland</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>re: Avoiding The Argument From History and Normality </title><link>http://mises.org/Community/blogs/brainpolice/archive/2008/10/09/avoiding-the-argument-from-history-and-normality.aspx#60400</link><pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 00:43:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:60400</guid><dc:creator>Stephan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;very insightful post Brainpolice, I like it. Great stuff&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://mises.org/Community/aggbug.aspx?PostID=60400" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Avoiding The Argument From History and Normality </title><link>http://mises.org/Community/blogs/brainpolice/archive/2008/10/09/avoiding-the-argument-from-history-and-normality.aspx#57369</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:45:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:57369</guid><dc:creator>wombatron</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Very good post. &amp;nbsp;Now I have something better to say against the standard &amp;quot;Why don&amp;#39;t you move to Somalia?&amp;quot; attack.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://mises.org/Community/aggbug.aspx?PostID=57369" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Avoiding The Argument From History and Normality </title><link>http://mises.org/Community/blogs/brainpolice/archive/2008/10/09/avoiding-the-argument-from-history-and-normality.aspx#57361</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:01:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:57361</guid><dc:creator>Cork</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent post! &amp;nbsp;I agree 100%. &amp;nbsp;I&amp;#39;ve always thought that these supposed historical examples are extremely dubious and murky. &amp;nbsp;Every time I&amp;#39;ve tried reading about these supposed examples of &amp;quot;anarchy,&amp;quot; I run into a bunch of crap that isn&amp;#39;t anarchistic at all. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Almost all of the authors eventually say something like &amp;quot;sure, the whole system was closely monitored by a state, but it&amp;#39;s still pretty much anarchy!&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;Ummm...no. &amp;nbsp;It&amp;#39;s either anarchy or it isn&amp;#39;t. &amp;nbsp;If there is any state, in any way, shape, or form, it is not anarchy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://mises.org/Community/aggbug.aspx?PostID=57361" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>