re: Anarchism and Democracy

Nitroadict — Mon, 12 May 2008 01:58:59 GMT

PDA's & retaliatory action towards the said anarcho-communists (which, in your scenario, sound like the initiators of coercion, thereby allowing all others the right to defend themselves), would solve this problem before it gets out of hand, methinks.

how would said anarcho-communists acquire the materials & labor force for such an agenda, as well? Breed themselves impressionable children to brainwash & grow over there years to take over their work? Sounds awfully inefficient, as most likely they would probably want the ability of individuals working for them, and probably reluctantly require to use the market, and if such an agenda were known or even rumored about, I highly doubt business would be booming for them.

Even if they tried circumventing the market, and tried stealing all their materials, they could easily be caught red-handed attempting such, preventing the growth of such an alarmist situation. At least, those are a few ways I can see it not happening, there is more, methinks.

BP could probably answer your question better than I.

re: Anarchism and Democracy

Cork2 — Sun, 11 May 2008 16:50:00 GMT

Most anarcho-communist however do not support a participatory democracy. They want everyone to collectively to be dependent on each other.

What if anarcho-communist invented a new weapon as deadly as the atomic weapon? What if they invented some new biotechnology that can threaten the upper class? What if they use these technologies to conquer the world, and not peacefully compete with anarcho-capitalists? They MUST obey the non-aggression axiom to prevent them from abusing their technologies.