<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://mises.org/Community/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>On Contradictions Between Philosophy and Action</title><link>http://mises.org/Community/blogs/brainpolice/archive/2009/03/17/on-contradictions-between-philosophy-and-action.aspx</link><description>Another problem that I see with the attempt to prove &amp;quot;self-ownership&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;property rights&amp;quot; as an a priori axoim that is inherently established by the act of argumentation (as Hans Hoppe&amp;#39;s argumentation ethics seems to essentially</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>re: On Contradictions Between Philosophy and Action</title><link>http://mises.org/Community/blogs/brainpolice/archive/2009/03/17/on-contradictions-between-philosophy-and-action.aspx#105909</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:27:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:105909</guid><dc:creator>Rick Dutkiewicz</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting arguments, but in dire need of Spelling Police. Sloppy spelling may be an indication of sloppy thinking, or not.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://mises.org/Community/aggbug.aspx?PostID=105909" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>