<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://mises.org/Community/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Austrian Addiction : obama</title><link>http://mises.org/Community/blogs/austrianaddiction/archive/tags/obama/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: obama</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>In Defense of Jindal</title><link>http://mises.org/Community/blogs/austrianaddiction/archive/2009/02/25/in-defense-of-jindal.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:22:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:93575</guid><dc:creator>Austrian Addiction</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://mises.org/Community/blogs/austrianaddiction/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=93575</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://mises.org/Community/blogs/austrianaddiction/archive/2009/02/25/in-defense-of-jindal.aspx#comments</comments><description>Last night president Obama gave a formal address - arguably a prelude for the next four years of government spending, intervention and regulation. The Wall Street Journal commented that his vague allusions to industry regulations and bailouts were interpreted...(&lt;a href="http://mises.org/Community/blogs/austrianaddiction/archive/2009/02/25/in-defense-of-jindal.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://mises.org/Community/aggbug.aspx?PostID=93575" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://mises.org/Community/blogs/austrianaddiction/archive/tags/obama/default.aspx">obama</category><category domain="http://mises.org/Community/blogs/austrianaddiction/archive/tags/stimulus/default.aspx">stimulus</category><category domain="http://mises.org/Community/blogs/austrianaddiction/archive/tags/new+orleans/default.aspx">new orleans</category><category domain="http://mises.org/Community/blogs/austrianaddiction/archive/tags/jindal/default.aspx">jindal</category></item><item><title>Stimulus committee</title><link>http://mises.org/Community/blogs/austrianaddiction/archive/2009/01/22/stimulus-committee.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:20:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:82041</guid><dc:creator>Austrian Addiction</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://mises.org/Community/blogs/austrianaddiction/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=82041</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://mises.org/Community/blogs/austrianaddiction/archive/2009/01/22/stimulus-committee.aspx#comments</comments><description>Last night I stopped the clicker on CSPAN for a while, it was one of the stimulus package committee meetings. Man these things are better drama then anything else that&amp;#39;s on TV! There was some obvious tension across party lines. Democrats presented...(&lt;a href="http://mises.org/Community/blogs/austrianaddiction/archive/2009/01/22/stimulus-committee.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://mises.org/Community/aggbug.aspx?PostID=82041" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://mises.org/Community/blogs/austrianaddiction/archive/tags/obama/default.aspx">obama</category><category domain="http://mises.org/Community/blogs/austrianaddiction/archive/tags/stimulus/default.aspx">stimulus</category></item><item><title>Should libertarians still vote for Obama?</title><link>http://mises.org/Community/blogs/austrianaddiction/archive/2008/09/17/should-libertarians-still-vote-for-obama.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 23:24:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:52102</guid><dc:creator>Austrian Addiction</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://mises.org/Community/blogs/austrianaddiction/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=52102</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://mises.org/Community/blogs/austrianaddiction/archive/2008/09/17/should-libertarians-still-vote-for-obama.aspx#comments</comments><description>Alex Tabarrok thought they should about a week ago because the costs of warfare in terms of economics and liberty are both so great and often under-estimated. This is an argument I find convincing, but now I&amp;#39;m not so sure. In recent comments about...(&lt;a href="http://mises.org/Community/blogs/austrianaddiction/archive/2008/09/17/should-libertarians-still-vote-for-obama.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://mises.org/Community/aggbug.aspx?PostID=52102" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://mises.org/Community/blogs/austrianaddiction/archive/tags/regulation/default.aspx">regulation</category><category domain="http://mises.org/Community/blogs/austrianaddiction/archive/tags/obama/default.aspx">obama</category><category domain="http://mises.org/Community/blogs/austrianaddiction/archive/tags/libertarianism/default.aspx">libertarianism</category><category domain="http://mises.org/Community/blogs/austrianaddiction/archive/tags/bush/default.aspx">bush</category></item></channel></rss>